OCR Text |
Show Journal of Neuro- Ophlhalmology 20( 2): 146, 2000. Errata In the 19: 3 issue of the Journal of Neuro- Ophthalmology, the article by Lindsay E. Mulhall, Dip App Sc ( Orth), Isla M. Williams, MD, FRACP, and Larry A. Abel, PhD, " Bedside Tests of Saccades After Head Injury," contained a misplaced decimal point in the Discussion. The sentence should have read: " The IRO study ( 1) demonstrated the low self- paced saccade rate was caused by both multiple steps ( 1.493 steps, ± 0.21, control subjects 1.295, +/- 0.14, p = 0.01) and prolonged average fixation time between saccades ( 359.57 msec, +/- 153.53, control subjects 287.71 msec, - H/- 48.35, p = TABLE 2. Results of bedside eye movement tests at initial assessment of patients with head injuries and control subjects % errors Memory guided Antisaccades Saccades in 30 sees Self- paced Patients with head injuries n = 19 Mean ( SD) 7.17( 5.45) 3.78 ( 3.84) 61.05( 12.66) Control subjects n = 26 Mean ( SD) 4.98( 6.71) 2.67 ( 3.96) 70.01 ( 13.88) p- value 2- tailed t test 0.249 0.350 0.032* * p< 0.05. TABLE 3. A comparison, using paired t tests, of the results of eye movement tests in control subjects at the bedside and in the laboratory ( infrared oculography) Bedside Infrared Controls Controls n = 5 n = 5 p- value Mean ( SD) Mean ( SD) 2- tailed t test % errors Memory guided 4.76( 3.37) 12.33( 7.4) 0.144 Antisaccades 1.88( 2.8) 6.67( 5.26) 0.189 Saccades in 30 sees Self- paced 73.4( 11.65) 70.6( 9.29) 0.40 © 2000 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc., Philadelphi. 0.115), the latter suggesting impaired disengagement" ( correction in bold). In addition, Tables 2 through 5 should have shown "% Errors" and " Saccades in 30 sec" as headings of equal status. The tables, as they should have appeared, are reproduced below. These errors were entirely our own and occurred after the authors' careful page proof review. The publisher apologizes for any inconveniences these errors have caused. TABLE 4. A comparison, using paired t tests, of the results of bedside eye movement tests in patients with TBI at initial assessment and at 6 months % errors Memory guided Antisaccades Saccades in 30 sec Self- paced First visit n = 5 Mean ( SD) 9.51( 6.72) 5.62 ( 4.64) 65( 15.65) 6- month review n = 5 Mean ( SD) 3.80 ( 3.98) 2.5 ( 5.59) 72.4( 12.82) p- value 2- tailed t test 0.178 0.089 0.238 TBI, traumatic brain injury. TABLE 5. A comparison, using paired t tests, of the results of bedside eye movement tests in control subjects at initial assessment and at 6 months First visit 6- month review n = 12 n = 12 p- value Mean ( SD) Mean ( SD) 2- tailed t test % errors Memory guided 2.86( 4.91) 3.57( 3.59) 0.710 Antisaccades 1.61( 2.98) 2.08( 2.43) 0.665 Saccades in 30 sec Self- paced 68.6( 12.31) 74.08( 7.91) 0.097 146 |