| OCR Text |
Show 42 The Utah statute fornia 'statute does Attorney-General rule"d that has open to law Cali it would be unlawful castrate the way to reads\T (the Cali-. our Eugenicists lay themselves of valid criticism when less The specify the operat ion, but "t h e not and unconstitutional fornia) present permits asexualization. they confine their advocacy of, sterilization to the op er-a t Lon s which "would not the unsex patientT Both the Utah and. the California statutes legal protection of the rights of the ster- rather full It ilization candidate ing friends, are and education to guara..s provided. once the protest the matter petent is is not probably take argued that the at true the in a measure, sterilization supposedly thrown into the and unbiased represent prepared by intelligence may be is made or advantage f the legal safe full This sometimes their guardians and sometimes patients, provide hands but hearing, of oom judges. 21. F.O.Butler, [.D., ledioal Superintendent State Home, Eldridge, California. Letter to dated }[ay 22, 1933. .. 22. "No t unsex the patient. fornia 1933 ssembly Bill, n \ ording No. 211. of of Sonoma writer, defeated Cali |
