| OCR Text |
Show ASSWfiRS TO QE7JSSTIGMiJBJS OF MaBCH 3 0 , Do y o u consider super vised summer projects worth while to girls? Yes; i t Is very valuable ( D . V/. Parratt Granite E. tf". Larsen, Cache) Give reason for and against 1922 I f summer p r o j e c t s a r e to continue what suggestions have you f o r b e t t e r o r more efficient organ ization? It gives girls the opportunity of c a r r y i n g on p u r p o s e f u l a c t i v i t y under su p e r v i s i o n . I t i s one of the b e s t means o f keeping c o n t r o l of t h e young people and holding up moral t o n e o f summer a c tivities* Group meetings at high s c h o o l seem t h e b e s t means o f g e t t i n g t h e work o v e r a t minimum cost and with maximum e f f e c t i v e n e s s * They must have t h e b a c k i n g of o t h e r or ganizations* This i s n e c e s s a r y from the standpoint of public opinion and a l s o from t h e stand point of efficiency of work done. Makes t h e work more p r a c t i c a l and is valuable in that it connects up the s c h o o l a n d t h e home* Women w h o c a n p u t i t o v e r a n d who have the right homemaking i d e a l . I s i t a d v i s - : E a s d e p a r t m e n t : What a r e y o u r :able to g e t :work been :suggestions as to :contact with:strengthened : d i v i s i o n of time iwomen's o r - :by u s e of :between teaching :ganizations?:of projects :by p r o j e c t s and : l n home 2so-called classI :economics? :room t e a c h i n g ? This contact i s v e r y much worth while from stand point cf public opin ion and also for value of cooperation. Contact with Beehive has been a de cided asset i n our work. They a r e partly re sponsible for social act!vities which ws consider a very valu able part of summer work. Yes, i t might be advantageous b u t we h a v e not done it. d x y * Yes ^ i d e d - Difficult say. to It is hard to t e l l a s so many factors enter into it. |