Capital account liberalization & income inequality: 1980-2009

Update item information
Publication Type honors thesis
School or College College of Social & Behavioral Science
Department Economics
Faculty Mentor Cihan Bilginsoy
Creator Esplin, Jessica
Title Capital account liberalization & income inequality: 1980-2009
Year graduated 2016
Date 2016-04
Description In this paper, I examine the relationship between income distribution and the capital market account from 1980 to 2009 across a sample of developed and semi-developed countries. A review of the literature suggests that capital account liberalization raises income inequality. Several factors alleged to contribute to this outcome include increased macroeconomic volatility and financial crises, decreased credit availability for the poor, and weakened progressive tax policies and transfer payments. The literature is incomplete, with a need for an empirical analysis. I address this gap by testing several panel regressions. I use two measures of income inequality to provide a comprehensive understanding of inequality-the Gini index and Palma index. I use Quinn's (1997) index for capital openness to measure capital account liberalization. The sample selection of 33 countries were chosen based on available data across three decades: 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s. I use these data to test the empirical model and my hypothesis that liberalizing a country's capital market account results in higher income inequality. I found a positive, statistically significant result for the effect of capital openness on income inequality when using the Gini index, and similar results when I tested the effects on a sample of semideveloped countries using both the Gini and Palma indices. The results of these regressions show that greater financial openness results in increased income inequality, and this effect is exacerbated for developing countries. This has important policy implications for determining domestic financial and welfare policy and suggests there is a tradeoff between liberalization and inequality. These results suggest liberalization may not be the best policy to undertake and if it cannot be avoided, important steps should be taken to mitigate inequality by strengthening financial and governmental institutions.
Type Text
Publisher University of Utah
Subject Income distribution - Mathematical models
Language eng
Rights Management (c) Jessica Esplin
Format Medium application/pdf
Format Extent 466,243 bytes
Identifier honors/id/41
Permissions Reference URL https://collections.lib.utah.edu/details?id=1254366
ARK ark:/87278/s6962std
Setname ir_htoa
Date Created 2016-06-27
Date Modified 2021-05-06
ID 205693
Reference URL https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6962std