OCR Text |
Show 1'" IrI/ II[ 01 CI""( I/[ Nt'/ Iro · ol'iltlllll", oloXY 12( 31: 210- 212, 1992. © 1992 Raven Press, Ltd., ' Myasthenia Gravis- like Syndrome Induced by Topical Ophthalmic Preparations A Case Report David Meyer, M. B., Ch. B., Robert C. Hamilton, M. B., Ch. B., F. R. C. P. C., and Howard V. Gimbel, M. D., F. R. C. S. C. This case study reports on a 64- year- old female who presented for cataract surgery. She relayed a history of allergic responses to local anesthetics such as xylocaine, but was otherwise in good health. Upon instilling ophthalmic preparations into her eyes during routine ocular examination, she developed general muscular weakness but not other allergic- like symptoms. Further investigation established her myasthenic- like syndrome to be precipitated by an ophthalmic mydriatic preparation. She was able to undergo uneventful cataract surgery and enjoy 20/ 20 vision postoperatively, with proper management. Key Words: Tropicamide- Cataract surgery- Ophthalmic preparation- Myasthenia gravis, From the Gimbel Eye Center, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Meyer, Gimbel Eye Center, Suite 450 4935 40 Avenue NW, Calgary Alberta, Canada T3A 2Nl. 210 A 64- year- old registered nurse was referred to our clinic by her family physician for evaluation of her cataracts. Her ophthalmic history noted only her decreased vision due to the cataracts, and dry eyes. Family history was insignificant except that she remembered that her late mother never underwent any local anesthesia. The patient wore a medic alert bracelet indicating an allergy to Xylocaine. She reported an episode 20 years ago in a dentist's chair when, after receiving a local anesthetic, she experienced a reaction that was interpreted as allergic in nature and she was advised never to have local anesthesia again. She clearly remembers the difficulty she had talking, as well as her shoes falling off her feet. Her recovery at that time was uneventful. She also recalled receiving a general anesthetic 20 years ago for a minor procedure, from which she took a long time to recover. Her general health was now good, however, and she was on no medications. As part of her routine ophthalmic examination the following eyedrops were instilled about 5 minutes apart: tropicamide 1%, phenylephrine HCl 2.5%, and proparacaine Hel 0.5%. Ten minutes later, she stated that she felt as if she were " floating." She was not dizzy or nauseous, but felt " high." The physical examination revealed the following findings: flushed face, sweaty hands, dry mouth, clear lungs, no laryngospasm, normal heart sounds, blood pressure of 180/ 95 mm Hg, and a pulse rate of 60/ minute ( sinus rhythm). She was fully aware and conscious, but lethargic. It was decided to only observe the patient and not to take any active intervention. After 1 hour she was fe~ ling well again, and her vital signs were normal, wIth a blood pressure of 124/ 84 mm Hg. The clinical picture that we observed did not fit in with a typical allergic reaction. The absence of signs of histamine release, such as u · ' ': an. a, MYASTHENIA GRAVIS- LIKE SYNDROME 211 chemosis, laryngospasm, bronchospasm, and hypotension, led us to doubt the previous diagnosis of an allergy to local anesthetics. The presence of dry mouth, flushed face, bradycardia, and hypertension was suggestive of an anticholinergic response. Her lethargy, slurred speech, and muscle weakness prompted us to convince the patient to consent to our rechallenging her with the same medications but administered separately. She consented, and the test was performed about 2 weeks later. Baseline observations included blood pressure; pulse; electrocardiogram; body temperature; upper extremity motor power for grip, flexion and extension; lower extremity motor power for flexion and extension; speech; ptosis; and diplopia. A venous access was established before instillation of any drops. One drop of tropicamide 1.0% was instilled first. Within 3 to 4 minutes after instillation she responded, subjectively and objectively, in exactly the same manner as before. Her motor power in both upper and lower extremities was 3/ 5 compared with 5/ 5 before the reaction. She was slightly tachypneic, but not markedly distressed. She had developed a ptosis in both upper lids, spoke slurrily, felt " high," experienced no diplopia, was fully aware and conscious, but utterly lethargic. An intravenous injection of 1.5 mg edrophonium chloride dramatically reversed the reaction within a matter of seconds. Her muscle power was restored ( 515), speech had returned to normal, the ptosis had disappeared, and she had no more subjective feelings of general weakness. After a half- hour she remained fine, and proparacaine drops 0.5% were instilled, one drop in both inferior fornices. Within 2 minutes she experienced exactly the same reaction as before. Once again, it was fully reversed with 1.5 mg endrophonium chloride. The last drug to be tested was phenylephrine 2.5%. She experienced absolutely no adverse responses to this drug in drop form. Qualitative acetylcholine receptor antibodies were tested for, but were absent, and the clinical diagnosis of druginduced myasthenia- like syndrome was established. Cataract surgery was subsequently successfully performed under local anesthesia. The patient once again developed the same syndrome of general muscular weakness after both the topical drops and the retrobulbar anesthetic. Her vital capacity was monitored throughout with a Wright's respirometer, and it too was severely reduced from 2.8 L at baseline to 0.5 L after the retrobulbar block. Intravenous edrophonium chloride reversed both the muscular weakness and the respiratory depression dramatically. Edrophonium chloride, a well- known short- acting drug, was needed in a 2 mg intravenous dose at four intervals throughout the entire procedure. Surgery was uneventful, and the patient enjoys 20/ 20 vision postoperatively. DISCUSSION It has been well documented that myasthenialike syndromes can be induced by a vast number of drugs ( 1- 14). Numerous pharmacologic agents, such as neuromuscular blockers, antibiotics, anticholinesterase agents, antiarrhythmics, anticonvulsants, beta blockers, corticosteroids, D- penicillamine, chloroquine, lithium, and magnesium, can also decrease transmission at the neuromuscular junction. Even toxins released by certain species of scorpions, ticks, wasps, spiders, and bacteria can also act at the neuromuscular junction. The pathogenesis of drug- induced myasthenia gravis- like syndrome ( DMG) is not clear. Current theories on the mechanism of DMG focus on altered immunological reactivity. A population of B- celllymphocytes has apparently been induced to manufacture antibodies to the acetylcholine receptors ( 10). This action could be the result of several mechanisms: ( a) altered acetylcholine- receptor antigenic properties, which make self- recognition more difficult ( 15); ( b) a loss of suppressor T- cell control over B- cell production of antibodies- in vitro studies demonstrate that D- penicillamine decreases T- cell division ( 16); ( c) direct stimulation of B cells, specific or nonspecific, which would lead to increased levels of antibodies ( 10); and ( d) a direct toxic effect of the drug on the acetylcholine receptor ( 17). It is a very rare occurrence, however, to have this syndrome precipitated by a topical ophthalmic preparation. Coppeto ( 3) reported a case of DMG after use of topical timolol 0.5% twice a day for 2 months. An increased acetylcholinereceptor antibody level of 4.0 nmole ( normal range, 0.0 to 1.0 nmole) was found. With discontinuation of the eyedrops the symptoms disappeared. We were unable to find any reports in the literature of proven myasthenic- like syndromes precipitated by any of the ophthalmic preparations used in our patient. The rapidity of onset of the systemic reactions has once again highlighted the well- known pharmacologic principle that absorption of drugs transconjunctivally occurs directly into the conjunctival capillaries or via the nasal mucosa. As a result, the metabolic conjugation JClill Niuro- ophthalmol. Vol. 12. No. 3. 1992 212 D. MEYER ET AL. pathways within the intestinal mucosa and the first- pass liver effects are eliminated ( 18). Consequently, a medication placed in the eye may exert a greater pharmacologic ( or immunosensitizing) effect than one administered orally. 50 often, this fact is not fully appreciated by medical staff administering topical preparations to patients. Therefore, we must recognize that potential inadvertent reactions to ophthalmic preparations are a reality and that these drugs should always be used and prescribed by medical staff who are well versed in pharmacology and the side effects of drugs. An eyedrop is as much a medicinal drug as an ampoule used for parenteral injections and should be used with the same amount of caution and respect. REFERENCES I. Confavreux C, Charles N. Aimard G. Fulminant myasthenia gravis soon after initiation of acebutolol therapy. Ellr Neural 1990; 30: 279--< l1. 2. Leys D. Pasquier F. Vermersch P. Gosset D. Michiels H. Kassiotis P. Petit H. Possible revelation of latent mvasthenia gravis by labetalol chlorhydrate ( letter). Acta elin Belg 1987; 42: 47'>- 6. 3. Coppeto JR. Timolol- associated myasthenia gravis ( letter). Am I OphthalmoI1984; 98: 2~ 5. 4. Argov Z, Brenner T. Abramsky O. Ampicillin may aggravate clinical and experimental myasthenia gravis. Arch Nellrol 1986; 43: 255- 6. 5. Fierro B. Castiglione MG. Salemi G. Savettieri G. Mvasthenia- like syndrome induced by cardiovascular ageri" ts. Report of a case. Ital J Neural SCI 1987; 8: 167- 9. 10'" NCII",- ophthalmol, Vol. 12, No. 3. 1992 6. Dilsaver Sc. Lithium down- regulates nicotinic recepte~ · lH skeletal muscle: cause of lithium associated myastht. Llc syndrome? ( letter). I Clin PsychopharmacoI1987; 7: 369- 70. 7. Sghirlanzoni A, Mantegazza R, Mora M, PareysanD, Cornelio F. Chloroquine myopathy and myasthema- hke syndrome. Mllscle Nare 1988; 11: 114- 9. 8. Benzing G Ill, Iannaccone ST, Bove KE. Keebler PI, Shicklev LL. Prolonged myasthenic syndrome after one week of m'uscle relaxants. Pedlatr Neural 1990; 6: 190-- 6. 9. Robberecht W. Bednarik I, Bourgeois P, van Hees I, Carton H. Myasthenic syndrome caused by direct effect of chloroquine on neuromuscular junction. Arch Neural 1989; 46: 464- 8. 10. Katz LJ, Lesser RL. Merikangas JR, Silverman JP. Ocular myasthenia gravis after D- penicillamine administration. Br IOph/ halmoI1989; 73: 1015-- 18. II Glaser JS. Intranuclear disorders of eye movement. In: Tasman W. Jaeger EA. eds. Dua/ le clinical ophthalmology. Vol. 2. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott. 1989: 1- 56. 12 Eckert GM. Systemic adverse effects of topical ophthalmic drugs: a clinical pharmacologist's view. Aus/ NZ I Ophthalmol 1985; 13: 81-- 4. 13. Fraunfelder FT, Meyer SM. Ocular toxicology update. Aus/ NZ I Ophthalmol 1984; 12: 391- 4. 14. Munroe WP. Rindtone JP, Kersher RM. Systemic side effects associated with the ophthalmic administration of tim0101. Dmg Intell Clin PhannacoI1985; 19: 8: r- 9. 15. Bever CT, Chanev MW. Penn AS. Jaffe IA. Bock E. Penicillamine induced mvasthenia gravis: effects of penicillamine on acetylcholine receptor. Neurology 1982; 32: 107782 16. Merryman P. Jaffe IA Effects of penicillamine on the proliferative response of human lymphocytes. Proc Soc Erp Bioi Med 1978; 157: 15:>- 8. 17. Kuncl RW. Pestronk A. Drachman DB. Rechtland E. The pathophysiology of penicillamine- induced myasthenia gravis. A/ In NeuroI1986; 20: 740- 4. 18. Cydulka RK. Seizures following the use of proparacaine hydrochloride eye drops. I Emerg Med 1990; 8: 131- 3. |