| OCR Text |
Show 215 of amplifications that, if Chapter is in fact a war of to war 9 the author is completely doing war, which wars involving at guides out speaks little more than just make just Honor as strongly out in Ii opposition essay is a or 94 96 II vv 94 Indeed, military pragmatism. the Obviously ... it becomes apparent that contemporary concept of the by virtually all combatants 95 96 to p. just single combat, arguments used lamely offered by men are war, or in however, duelling. to justify alike condemned As Professor Paul Jorgensen has 34. In such by God, the author who would descend to lithe nature of Shakespeare's Military World, p. 286. Ibi d. . , Loque's mistaken--concern overriding--and 95 de pointed out, The tone of HA Discourse of War re" is , Ibid., in favor of the vengeance, the standard motivations, and the will of sardonic comment upon man's with "honor policy, and to use which constitutes the second half of de Loques enumerates and refutes the rationalizations Ii Christian Prince, "then difficulty no to strongly the standard interpretation of the outcome, brute beasts. a maintains "Chrrsttan" adversaries. volume, he both as by cause articulating was-c-Indeed, is--appealed the "T'reatise of Single Combat, combat. war a theological overlay, Though de Loque speaks he for unconcerned with the reader penetrates the once Chapter VI, for example, the author surprise and take their enemies at advantage, de Loque is not just In being waged let the chief captains and ruse V. pietistical and pp. 53 54 - . |
