| OCR Text |
Show 34 to the right t.rfe g r e a t e r is the error represented by her scoring. Figure Bfcettt Bhows his scale samples shows the The solid the 16 in his dork line dark line the 16 in mind, IV, the mean of too far away from his accurate ratings his final each this his teacher of for the with ratings inaccurate samples. 16 be only guesses. rating is 1.53 or T'udelson to had be line of and the >aofi the no The value was drawn t o his an improvement ie considered to line, conforms mean.of shown in Table three considered times an the more show final of showing 86 to be his regularly the percent. evidence with correct ratings, Kudelson final as ratings of the the or standard values shown red for in Table A systematic of highly the IV, error accurate 16 of >. a m e A wide their variation samples. is .20, only .20 scoring, ac teachers In Scale« adlilt? to existed evaluate at first among children's compositions. s 2. The 11 t e a c h e r s concerned more n e a r l y u n i f o r m a s a r e s u l t of s t u d y in this experiment in t h e i r r a t i n g and p r a c t i c e . of com line, SUMMARY. 1. of standard approximately standard 16 ratings of As It samples. same he could the red scale conception 5. the standard, the Since of The initial the for number each tests. teacher's compared final by standard and for composition dotted position, cording the as made scorer. The The scale shows shows of the initial samples, shows reeord rating line all which to standard scale broken solid relation the became compositions or |
