OCR Text |
Show INDEX ACRE FOOT, definition of.. ( See " Explanation'" opposite page I) AFFLECK, A. D., photograph of ALEXANDER. J. II.. photographs of ALLEN. J. II.. photograph of 78. 86 93 ALPINE- DRAPER TUNNEI 80- 81. 88. S9. 92. 94, 97 Contractor- construction dates 88. 89 Construction progress 97 Cost 89 Extra work orders 89 Length 88 Location S9, 94 Photographs 92 Map 94 Right of way 89. 94 Relationship in Provo River Project ( Chart)... 76- 77 ALUNITE PLANT, Salt Lake City 120 ALVORD, BURDICK & HOYVSON Assumptions and Estimates 101 to 103, 108 Burdick, Chas. B. photograph 57 Aqueduct construction urged 59, 60 Dike Project- Utah Lake 57 Estimates and Assumptions 101 to 103, 108 Experience in other cities 55 Population- planning 103, 104. 108 Recommendations 56, 57, 58 Scope of survey 55 Survey and Report 55, 98 Utah Lake Dike- recommendations 57, 58 AMERICAN FORK, METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT 82 AQUEDUCT, SALT LAKE VALLEY Alpine- Draper Tunnel 80- 81.89.92 Approved by U. S. Government Approved by Salt Lake City taxpayers Capacity of Contractor- first 9.1 miles Alpine- Draper Tunnel Olmsted tunnel Contracts- construction 80- 81, Effects of Repayment Construction- Progress 88, Proposed 23, Urged Cost estimates- contract costs 61, 66. Distribution of water 88. 95, 105 Division- of Provo River Project Draper- Alpine Tunnel 80- 81. 88, 89. Election- called Ballot results Extra work orders Filtration of water Financing terms 59, 60. 66, 67, 95, 1 Fulure problems 101, 105 Joint design Location Management 95, 105 Materials Necessity of, usefulness 67, 105 Olmsted tunnel 80 Olmsted tunnel, photographs Pipe plant, Pleasant Grove Problems, engineering, legal, miscellaneous 93, 101, 105 Proposed construction 23, Progress of construction 88, 94. 97 61 63 88 89 88 88 38, 89 101 93 89, 97 60, 64 59, 60 89, 95 to 121 88 92, 97 61 65 89 93 11, 112 to 121 8S S8 to 121 to 121 • 81, 88 92 to 121 60, 61 89, 97 Provo River Project- Relationships 80. 81. 88, 89 Division of 88 to 95 Relationships- to Provo River Project 80- 81, 88. 89 to Salt lake County lis to War effort 119 Repayment contract 66. 88, 95 terms of 95 Rights of way 89, 93, 94 map of 94 Specifications 88 Surveys 60 Water, treatment 95 distribution 93 War effort, value to 119. 120 ARGENTA RESERVOIR PROJECT Bond election- defeated 26 Construction urged 24 Feasibility examined 24. 25, 96 ARMY, water demands of 120 ASSOCIATED CANAL COMPANIES- Utah Lake rights 51 ATWOOD, L. M„ photograph of 79 AUERBACH, HERBERT S„ photographs of 52, 78 BEAVER POND reservoir project . BECK, EMMA F., photograph of .. BEEMER. JOHN A., photograph of BEERS, W. D., photographs of ... BEERS, W. D. 1934 Deer Creek report 1937 Deer Creek report Photograph BIG COTTONWOOD Creek 2, 9, 22, 24, 25, Argenta Project 24, 25, Conduit Storage, 1929 proposals 22, 24, BIG DITCH Construction date BLOOD, HENRY H., photographs of BOOTH DECREE Utah Lake BUNDY, ORA, photograph of , BURDICK, CHAS. B., photograph of BURDICK REPORT ( Alvord, Burdick & Howson) Assumptions and estimates 101 to 1 Aqueduct construction urged Burdick, Chas. B.- photograph Dike project, Utah Lake Estimates and assumptions 101 to 1 Experience in other cities Population- planning 105. 1 Recommendations 56, Scope of survey Survey and report Utah Lake Dike CHALK CREEK, source of supply CITY CREEK Culinary use High- line conduit Equalizing reservoirs 78 26, 51 40 ( 05 26, 3i 26, 96 26. 96 9 26. 96 42. 63 20 113 5" 05. 108 59, 60 37 57 105. 198 35 04. 108 . 57, 38 55 55 , 98 57, 58 |