Publication Type |
Journal Article |
School or College |
College of Social & Behavioral Science |
Department |
Political Science |
Creator |
Francis, John G.; Francis, Leslie P. |
Title |
Rationing of health care in Britain: an ethical critique of public policy-making |
Date |
1986 |
Description |
IN BRITAIN, as in the United States, rationing of health care is a fact of life and death. Some rationing is overt, such as the Stanford heart transplant program's decision not to accept very young or older patients.1 Some is disguised, such as day-to-day decisions in hospitals about "do not resuscitate" orders2 or the reported British reluctance to offer dialysis to older patients who might be a bit "crumbly."3 |
Type |
Text |
Publisher |
Rowman & Littlefield Publishers |
First Page |
119 |
Last Page |
134 |
Subject |
Rationing; National Health Service |
Subject LCSH |
Health care rationing -- Great Britain; Medical care -- Great Britain -- Moral and ethical aspects; Medical policy -- Great Britain -- Moral and ethical aspects; Medical economics -- Great Britain; Medical care -- Decision making |
Language |
eng |
Bibliographic Citation |
Francis, J. G., Francis, L. P. (1986). Rationing of health care in Britain: an ethical critique of public policy-making, in Should medical care be rationed by age? Rowman and Littlefield, 119-34. |
Rights Management |
(c)Rowman & Littlefield Publishers This material is still protected by copyright. All rights reserved. Please contact the publisher for permission to copy, distribute or reprint. |
Format Medium |
application/pdf |
Format Extent |
9,067,988 bytes |
Identifier |
ir-main,4258 |
ARK |
ark:/87278/s6x06r6z |
Setname |
ir_uspace |
ID |
703424 |
Reference URL |
https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6x06r6z |