Publication Type |
Journal Article |
School or College |
School of Medicine |
Department |
Psychiatry |
Creator |
Drews, Frank |
Other Author |
Strayer, D. L; Albert, R. W. |
Title |
Negative priming and stimulus repetition: a reply to Neill and Joordens |
Date |
2002 |
Description |
Negative priming is reliably obtained with repeated items, but not with novel items. Here, we review why these stimulus repetition effects raise problems for memory based theories of negative priming. Furthermore, we provide empirical evidence casting doubt on Neill and Joordens's (2002) claimthat perceptual facilitation masks the effects of episodic retrieval with novel items. Finally, we discuss several theoretical and methodological issues raised in the reply by Neill and Joordens. We conclude that a more straightforward interpretation of these stimulus repetition effects is one based on activation-sensitive inhibition. |
Type |
Text |
Publisher |
Psychonomic Society Publications |
Volume |
64 |
Issue |
5 |
First Page |
861 |
Last Page |
865 |
Subject |
Negative priming; Stimuli; Perception |
Subject LCSH |
Aversive stimuli; Perception |
Dissertation Institution |
University of Utah |
Language |
eng |
Bibliographic Citation |
Drews, F., Strayer, D. L., & Albert, R. W. (2002). Negative priming and stimulus repetition: A reply to Neill and Joordens. Perception and Psychophysics, 64(5), 861-65. |
Rights Management |
(c) Psychonomic Society Publications |
Format Medium |
application/pdf |
Format Extent |
172,290 bytes |
Identifier |
ir-main,2671 |
ARK |
ark:/87278/s6kk9vxh |
Setname |
ir_uspace |
ID |
702675 |
Reference URL |
https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6kk9vxh |