Emory University School of Medicine, Emory Eye Center, Atlanta, GA
Subject
Research; Publication; Impact Factor
Description
Scientific publications are essential for researchers and clinicians in academic centers. Who should be included as co-authors is an important decision which should be made before the article is finalized. How to ensure that an article is eventually published is always challenging and time consuming. We have all experienced the challenges and setbacks of difficult reviewers. These critiques can be both an emotional and intellectual hurdle to overcome, particularly after dedicating so much work. Careful response and attention to detail as well as persistence are the key to success. This presentation will address common questions such as why publish and how can I be an author?; my paper was rejected! Now what?; mastering reviewers' feedback: A revision is requested! How to respond to reviewers?; my paper is accepted! Now what?; someone did not like my paper and sent an aggressive letter to the editor! Now what?
Date
2024-03
References
1. Righini C, Laccourreye O, Fakhry N, Franco-Vidal V, Leboulanger N, Lisan Q, Radulesco T, Rumeau C, Schmerber S, Simon F, Thaï Van H, Vergez S, Vincent C, Jankowski R. Writing in the European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology Head & Neck Diseases. Dos and Don'ts! Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2023 Sep 29:S1879-7296(23)00121-7. doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2023.09.005. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37778943. 2. Daroff RB, Rowland LP, Scism C. Suggestions to authors. Neurology. 1988 Oct;38(10):1657-8. 3. Bartley GB, Liesegang TJ. Just because it's published doesn't mean it's perfect: the continuing evolution of the peer review process. Ophthalmology. 2015 Oct;122(10):1958-9.
Language
eng
Format
video/mp4
Type
Image/MovingImage
Source
2024 North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society Annual Meeting