A Comparative Study of LLMs, Human Experts, and Expert-Edited LLMs to Neuro-Ophthalmology Questions

Update Item Information
Identifier 20240305_nanos_posters_398
Title A Comparative Study of LLMs, Human Experts, and Expert-Edited LLMs to Neuro-Ophthalmology Questions
Creator Prashant Tailor; Lauren Dalvin; Matthew Starr; Deena Tajfirouz; Kevin Chodnicki; Michael Brodsky; Sasha Mansukhani; Heather Moss; Kevin Lai; Melissa Ko; Devin Mackay; Marie DiNome; Oana Dumitrascu; Misha Pless; Eric Eggenberger; John Chen
Affiliation (PT) (LD) (MS) (DT) (KC) (MB) (SM) (MD) (OD) (MP) (EE) (JC) Mayo Clinic; (HM) Stanford School of Medicine Department of Ophthalmology, Department of Neurology & Neurological Sciences; (DM) Indiana University School of Medicine; (MK) Indiana University
Subject Miscellaneous
Description While large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in medicine, their effectiveness compared to human experts remains unclear. This study evaluates the quality and empathy of Expert+AI, human experts, and LLM responses in neuroophthalmology.
Date 2024-03
References None provided.
Language eng
Format application/pdf
Type Text
Source 2024 North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society Annual Meeting
Relation is Part of NANOS Annual Meeting 2024: Poster Session: Analytical Studies: Neuro-Ophthalmic Practice
Collection Neuro-Ophthalmology Virtual Education Library: NANOS Annual Meeting Collection: https://novel.utah.edu/collection/nanos-annual-meeting-collection/
Publisher North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society
Holding Institution Spencer S. Eccles Health Sciences Library, University of Utah
Rights Management Copyright 2024. For further information regarding the rights to this collection, please visit: https://NOVEL.utah.edu/about/copyright
ARK ark:/87278/s6pf38dg
Setname ehsl_novel_nam
ID 2594225
Reference URL https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6pf38dg