| Description |
Sterilization of genetically defective inmates in Utah state institutions is one alternative for dealing with these individuals. However, the area of genetic improvement is very sensitive to the tension between social demands and individual freedom and ethical questions remain unanswered. If we admit that we do have the technical means of using sterilization for racial improvement, we must then ask if it is morally defensible. Two ethical viewpoints from which to analyze the question are basic rights and utilitarianism. These viewpoints present opposing argument that emphasize the problems to be found in the act. This is not to say that either viewpoint can effectively deal with the problems, but they help to clarify the act's purposes and justifications. Before getting into the area of ethical analysis, we need to examine the eugenics movement (especially that of the early 1900's) which was the primary impetus behind Utah's act. A basic understanding of its history and assumptions sheds light upon the ends sought by the Utah act. |
