Correlation Between Visual Acuity and Foveal Threshold by Automated Perimetry With Size V Stimulus

Title Correlation Between Visual Acuity and Foveal Threshold by Automated Perimetry With Size V Stimulus
Creator Parker E. Bohm; Leanne Stunkel; Gregory P. Van Stavern
Affiliation Departments of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (PEB, LS, GPVS) and Neurology (LS, GPVS), Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
Abstract Background: Visual acuity has been shown to correlate with foveal threshold as determined by automated perimetry. Although automated perimetry with size V stimulus is commonly used in neuro-ophthalmology practice, the relationship between the visual acuity and the foveal threshold with this larger stimulus is not well known. Methods: Retrospective study of patients who had undergone neuro-ophthalmology evaluation and visual field testing with automated perimetry using size V stimulus. Healthy controls were also recruited. Using visual acuity and foveal threshold, Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated, and basic foveal threshold statistics were stratified by visual acuity. Prediction intervals for visual acuities by various foveal threshold were also calculated. Results: A total of 106 unique eyes were included. The final Pearson correlation coefficient between visual acuities was -0.795 for the right eye and -0.578 for the left eye, with a pooled correlation coefficient of -0.751 ( P < 0.001). A foveal threshold of at least 34 dB was present in 94.4% of eyes with 20/20 visual acuity, and a foveal threshold of greater than 35 dB was not observed in eyes with visual acuity of 20/40 or worse. Conclusions: Foveal threshold as determined by automated perimetry using size V stimulus has moderate-to-strong correlation with visual acuity in patients undergoing neuro-ophthalmology evaluation.
Date 2024-12
Date Digital 2024-12
References Flaxel CJ, Samples JR, Dustin L. Relationship between foveal threshold and visual acuity using the Humphrey visual field analyzer. AM J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:875-877. Keltner JL, Johnson CA, Cello KE, Dontchev M, Gal RL, Beck RW; Optic Neuritis Study Group. Visual field profile of optic neuritis: a final follow-up report from the optic neuritis treatment trial from baseline through 15 years. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010;128:330-337. Chiba N, Imasawa M, Goto T, Imai M, Iijima H. Foveal sensitivity and visual acuity in macular thickening disorders. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2012;56:375-379. Wall M, Brito CF, Woodward KR, Doyle CK, Kardon RH, Johnson CA. Total deviation probability plots for stimulus size V perimetry: a comparison with size III stimuli. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126:473-479. Johnson CA, Wall M, Thompson HS. A history of perimetry and visual field testing. Optom Vis Sci. 2011;88:E8-E15.
Language eng
Format application/pdf
Type Text
Publication Type Journal Article
Source Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology, December 2024, Volume; 44, Issue 4
Collection Neuro-Ophthalmology Virtual Education Library: Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology Archives: https://novel.utah.edu/jno/
Publisher Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
Holding Institution Spencer S. Eccles Health Sciences Library, University of Utah
Rights Management © North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society
ARK ark:/87278/s6ydm6tx
Setname ehsl_novel_jno
ID 2932945
Reference URL https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6ydm6tx