Head Turn During Visual Field Testing to Minimize the Influence of Prominent Facial Anatomy

Title Head Turn During Visual Field Testing to Minimize the Influence of Prominent Facial Anatomy
Creator Seyedmostafa Sadegh Mousavi; Sepideh Jamali Dogahe; Lance J. Lyons; Cheryl L. Khanna
Affiliation Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
Abstract Background: Facial contour naturally decreases the visual field. Peripheral visual field defects caused by facial anatomy and ocular pathology can be missed in a routine standard of care. Mathematically calculating the true angle for turning the head to optimize the peripheral visual field has not been studied to date. The purpose of this study was to explore the utility of turning the head during perimetry to maximize the testable visual field. Methods: Six healthy study participants aged 18-52 were enrolled, prospectively; the dominant eye of each participant was tested. In total, 60-4 visual fields were obtained from each participant's dominant eye with the head in primary position. Then, the 60-4 tests were repeated with the head turned prescribed degrees toward and away from the tested eye ("manual method"). Based on a photograph of the participant's face, a convolutional neural network (CNN) was used to predict the optimal head turn angle for maximizing the field, and the test was repeated in this position ("automated method"). Results: Maximal visual field exposure was found at a head turn of 15° away from the tested eye using the manual method and was found at an average head turn of 12.6° using the automated method; maximum threshold values were similar between manual and automated methods. The mean of threshold in these subjects at the standard direction and the predicted optimum direction was 1,302, SD = 69.35, and 1,404, SD = 67.37, respectively ( P = 0.02). Conclusions: Turning the head during perimetry maximizes the testable field area by minimizing the influence of prominent facial anatomy. In addition, our CNN can accurately predict each individual's optimal angle of head turn for maximizing the visual field.
Subject Adolescent; Adult; Face / anatomy & histology; Female; Head Movements / physiology; Healthy Volunteers; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Visual Field Tests / methods; Visual Fields / physiology; Young Adult
Date 2024-06
Date Digital 2024-06
References Park SC, Kung Y, Su D, et al. Parafoveal scotoma progression in glaucoma: Humphrey 10-2 versus 24-2 visual field analysis. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:1546-1550. De Moraes CG, Hood DC, Thenappan A, et al. 24-2 visual fields miss central defects shown on 10-2 tests in glaucoma suspects, ocular hypertensives, and early glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2017;124:1449-1456. Scuderi GL, Cesareo M, Perdicchi A, Recupero SM. Standard automated perimetry and algorithms for monitoring glaucoma progression. Prog Brain Res. 2008;173:77-99. Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, Hyman L, Bengtsson B, Hussein M; Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the early manifest glaucoma trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:1268-1279. Wall M, Lee EJ, Wanzek RJ, Chong LX, Turpin A. Temporal wedge defects in glaucoma: structure/function correlation with threshold automated perimetry of the full visual field. J Glaucoma. 2020;29:191-197.
Language eng
Format application/pdf
Type Text
Publication Type Journal Article
Source Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology, June 2024, Volume 44, Issue 2
Collection Neuro-Ophthalmology Virtual Education Library: Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology Archives: https://novel.utah.edu/jno/
Publisher Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
Holding Institution North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Association. NANOS Executive Office 5841 Cedar Lake Road, Suite 204, Minneapolis, MN 55416
Rights Management © North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society
ARK ark:/87278/s6cffe9c
Setname ehsl_novel_jno
ID 2721526
Reference URL https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6cffe9c
Back to Search Results