| Title | 61032 |
| State | Utah |
| County | Salt Lake County |
| City | Murray |
| Address | 4288 S 500 East |
| Scanning Institution | Utah Correctional Institute |
| Holding Institution | Utah Division of State History |
| Collection | Utah Historic Buildings Collection |
| Building Name | 4288 S 500 East; Hill, William Hood, House; Murray, Salt Lake County |
| UTSHPO Collection | General Files |
| Spatial Coverage | Salt Lake County |
| Rights Management | Digital Image © 2020 Utah Division of State History. All Rights Reserved. |
| Publisher | Utah Division of State History, Preservation Section |
| Genre | Historic Buildings |
| Type | Text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Date Digital | 2020-11-02 |
| Language | eng |
| ARK | ark:/87278/s60s5d8w |
| Setname | dha_uhbr |
| ID | 1605622 |
| OCR Text | Show - This text message is used to keep the image from rotating in ocr process. Be sure to crop the top .25" off after the ocr process. 4288 Sou t h 500 East ~ill, William Hood, House Murray, Sal t Lake Count y UTAH STATE HISTORY 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 3 9222 00536 0388 -:1. CI~eo ? q '3 7 5L LJ{ I' ~ht (~ (', ) ~a'fY'ttS C, ',cI~ q4- I J'iJ c.. 9(:;'6- 53<g~ OWher \~ vvQt'\.b r1-o Know \Ik-tlr tv ~~ el'7[b1e ~ ,-f shoulJ f('orer1-'7 rill u-ed +0 rS SubMit f16\1}\,Il4t1t'6Y1 TO: POSTMASTER: Contents Merchandise-Fourth Class Matter. This parcel may be opened for postal inspection if necessary. RETURN POSTAGE GUARANTEED seon M. MATHESON GOVERNOR July 29, 1982 Division of State History (UTAH STATE HISTORiCAl SOCIETY) STATE OF UTAH DEPARTMENTOFCOMMUNtTY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MELVIN T. SUITH. DIRECTOR 300 RIO GRANDE SALT LAKE CITY. UTAH 84101 TELEPHONe801/53$-5755 Mr. &Mrs. Cleeo Wright, Sr. 5937 Kamas Circle Salt Lake City, Ute 84118 Dear Mr. &Mrs. Wright: Thank you for your submission of the William Hood Hill House, 420 E. 4200 So., Murray, for possible nomination to the National Register of Historic Places. In reviewing the materials that you sent to us, several observations and comments come to mind. First, the National Register reviewers in Washington, D.C. look specifically at the "integrity" of a building. Their guidelines state, "To meet the criteria properties listed in the National Register must retain their historic integrity." That is, how much has the building been changed or altered, and if it has, when? Therefore, for us to provide you with our determination of eligibility, we would like additional photographs and specific dates of construction and additions or alterations, so that our architectural historian can review them. He can then determine if the residence retains its integrity and if it may be eligible on the basis of its architecture. In addition, the National Register Office has currently tightened its review procedure. All nominations submitted are substantially reviewed and screened for specific reasons as to why they meet the "Criteria for Evaluation" (a copy of which is enclosed). If a house, such as the Hill House, is significant in the theme of "religion" it must be shown and documented specifically as to why the residence is significant and how the home relates to others which may be considered of equal importance. Has the Hill House ever been mentioned or part of a study appearing in a scholarly history of the LOS Church, or of the lives of any of the church officials mentioned in your history? This information would help in documenting "exactly" how and why the Hill House is important in Mormon history, and thus religion. The above comments also pertain to the role and importance of William H. Hill. For a building to be eligible under "Criteria B" ("associated with the lives of persons Significant in our pastil), it must be stated and documented as to specifically how this person (or persons) were significant. What exactly did State History Board: Milton C. Abrams, Chairman • Theron H. luke • Ted J . Warner • Etizabeth Montague • Thomas G. Alexander Delio G. Dayton • Wayne K. Hinton • Helen Z. Papanikolas • David S. Monson • Elizabeth Griffith • William D. Owens they do and how has that been shown to be of importance. Again, references to scholarly articles or books mentioning William H. Hill and his importance would be helpful. This information is needed so that we can adequately determine if the Hill House is elgibile for listing in the National Register. Since the register office demands such information . and clarity in our nominations that are sent to Washington, we must use the same approach in evaluating properties prior to submitting them to our state review committee. Again, thank you for your interest in historic preservation, and we look forward to hearing from you in the future. If you have any questions, please contact our office. Sincerely, Philip F. Notarianni Hi stori an PFN/ch Enclosure WILLIAM HOOD HILL'S HOHE Present address of home 420 Fa."lt 4,200 South, HuZTa¥, Utah. The purpose of this nrit1ng is to record the church historical signii'igance of this home and thus it becomes necessary to include some personal history and events to help the reader gain a prospective. In the 1830's the families Of Ifil11a,m H. Hill and John Taylor, who was to become the third presid$nt of the church, wes closely associated in Toronto. Canada. · '!bere is a. book titled Hill Farrlly History wr1 tten by Danial B. Hill R1chards. Copyrieht applied 'f:or September, 1926. Printed. F'ebruary, 1926. this book establishes the Hill Fardly as a member of the John Taylor society at the time when Parley P. Pratt ca,mo to preach to them in 1836. All thirty m.emhers of the Hill Fa.mily Here r..aptised the 12th of Aprtl, 1840 in rl'oronto, Canada. A copy of this book is in the possession of Sister Blanch 11usser Belcher of Salt lake, g:ra.ndde.U0hter of' \-1i111c.m H. Hill. William H. Hill JI'..arrled Mary Caroline Sorensen, the 1st of Janua.ry, 1860 in Millcreek area and thay lived in Mendon, Utah, until after 1862 when their' second child Has also born in Hendon. Between 1862 and 1864 they purchased s1xty acres of land from Hilliam H. Hill's brother in law, Hugh Park who had raceived it and other land as a grant fron the U. S • governmant. '!he two year period. 1862-1864. is necessary because actual date o:f construction is unknorm. place of birth 1ls ted as J.1i~lcroslt '!heir third ch1ld was born in 1864 with and I1111creeIt is the name of the area. in which the property 1s locatad. Tno boundaries of tho property as represented by current streets nere Third East to Fifth Fast, and 39th South to about 45th South. By way of interest, in t."'e 1800's 17th South was 11th South, 21st South was 12th South, 27th South was 13th South, 3Jrd South was 14th South, and 39th South llas 15th South. Wlll1am and his 111fe. r,lary, cloa.red the sagebrush from a. low hill on the property and beoaan construction of the contracted to build the home. Hi110reek Canyon. house~ A man by the name of Green Rock for the foundation was hauled :f'rom The walls were adobe from the local area. sidewalks were added and are still 1n use. Cement A small cella.r was placed wlder the home with an access from one of the rooms. Jacob F. Hill, bom 18'79. the tenth child of vl1lllam and Mary Hill, told his niece, Itl.ry' 11usser Wright, that he remembered. as a. small boy, a.bout 10 years old, going with his father to the canyon and broue}1t home pine tr.e as a.nd planted. them by the house. 'lhis was probably in 1889 or 1890, those trees are still there. William Hill was a. rancher; his ranch was in Wyoming. As his fa.mily grew to nine boys and ona da.ughter there was a.n a.dd.1 tion of brick added to the north end of the home. 'The home now consisted. of tuelve rooms and the front of the house :faced the rising sun. It is interesting· to note that evan· thoW-"oh the water table 1n this area was h1gh, wells for the home, etc. t were not dug but drilled to obtain a. flow. : After the home nas established many of the General Author! ties of the church u,pon visiting in the area for conference meetings, etc., would more often than not s~ over night. Some of Brother Hill's sons would glve up their beds and sleep in one of the two big barns. Brother Hill l-rould often send some of his boys with a buggy to bring the General. Authorities a.nd. take them home the next day or so. It has been asked "my thcy would bother to atay overnight l-lhen i.his home ,ras only eight or ten miles from their own. The probable reasons werel 1. It 2. There were no stroot lights. 3. Fifth East was juet a muddy rutted wagon trace. 4. '!he home was large and accom. nod.a.tlng. l JaS usually after dark and eOI!l9tlmes late l--rh('..!l meetiI\5s liere over. 5. The close and lon£ friendship of the W1ll1a.m Hill and John Taylor families. 6. Because Brother H1ll was a successful. rancher and had a large :family, there was abreye e.n abundance of good food. on the table. Ma.r,y Caroline H1ll Musser, born 1874, daughter of W1llia..m H. Hill was 12 or 13 years old l-then President John Taylor spent so much time ill her father's home. John Taylor ar.d company, includ1ng George Q. cannon, clerlt John L. Nuttall and others" stopped at the residence of 1I1lllam H. H1ll in Millcreek for about three weeks golng there from the residence of Brother },'hi ts or Carlisle, and before he went to Centerville. John W. \>10011ey'l3 house. While at the Hill house he dedicated the place as one of safety for :Brother and Sister Hill ;:md family, and their posterityr and while there he was. visited D;t least once by Joseph Smith. the Prophet. She told her oldest child, J.iary Hill lTusser, bom 190,3. hOll Preddent John Taylor and others would be hidden in the small cell.ar under the front room when the civil authorities would coma searching and of a time when they thought he the h,~y liaS bi<i1.ng in one of the barns and went throush all of in both barns with p1 tchforks 1n hopes of finding and perhaps stabbiI'.g hiu. At times it was neccscary to conceal President Taylor and the others in , a load of hay in order to transport them between the Ca.rliale ar.d H1ll homes. Th.e oorr.s were lar.re so that a load of ha.y could 00 dr1ven in one sida and out the other with doors on both sides. '111ey would leave the ba.:t'IlS and go to the house a.t night under cover of da.rlmess. Ui1l1a1l1 X1cola1 H1l1, born l8Gh. about 22 years old at the time (son of llilll.am H. Hill) prophcsized at that time that he would. see these same clvil authorH,ies on "ehe su"Cets of Salt Lake City in very shabby clothing. 'Illis did coma to pass. lJefo:r.e President 'laylor left the Hill home he blessed. 1t that 1t would be a. haven of peace and re:fuge • •JUllam H. Hill m;Lr.rlcd his second wife, Ellzabeth Hamilton, 14 F'o'brua.zy 3.8'70 in the old Endowment House in Salt LaJ,e City. l'l1th him and his first wif'o in their home. She then went to 11ve They were very cOmPatible. Her first child, a. boy. was bom 19 FebruaJ:y 1871 and by the time Uill1a.m H. Hill lras ca.lled on his miss10n there were 14 children, of the combined fa.m1lies, in the H1ll hor.te even though her first born had died at. 7 months of age. All of the children coooidered each other as full r not half, brothers and sisters. It was decided that because of ~Jle circumstances with the government and the size of the two families tha.t Elizabeth take her five childJ.."01l ~d J:love to a home in G%'aI'lger until Willia.m H. Hlll returned from his mission. r.n 1892, four years after his return he bull t a sr.aller home for her and her fa.Jldly on t.~e east side of Fif th D.\.st, dil.'ectly a.cross from the big home. On the 20th of Novem"b€lr. 1886, William H. Hlll ~'as set apart to go on a mission and shorvly after this d.a.te whUe a.t home packing his bags the civil authorities came to arrest him for pluxaJ. marriage charges. they came to t.lJe door he nas alerted ~1d toolc his As ba« and stepping out one of tho rear windovrs went down "t.hrough tho fields and on his mission. When he returned home after being released frOm his mission, November 7. 1888. he was arrested and spent six months in prison. President Lorenzo Snow also visited the Hill home. Jacob F. Hill (a son of William H. Hill) with his wife went to Sa.lt Lake City to bring him to the home. When ready to leave they took him back to Salt Lake. 'lhe buggy they used to take him home had only one small seat and so Sister Hill sa.t on President Snow's lap. At the time she was carrying her unborn son, Anthon, aJ)d President Snow said he felt he should give her a blessing. He said that the unborn child that she carried would always be a comfort and never leave her and always be near. Now this blessing came to pass as Anthon Hill always lived near and took oare of his parents untU they died. At this writing Anthon is still alive. Vhen President Heber J. Grant was still an apostle he also was a guest in the Hill hOlne. Sister l1ary Hrlght. granddaughter of William H. Hill, tells of a time when she was a baby in arms as related to her by her mother. '''~lle sitting in a. rocker feeding nr::/ baby Nary, a voice came to me saying that I should get up and move and having been taught to pay heed to such things I got up and moved t6 the other side of the room and shortly a.fter the plaster of the ceiling over the place where I was first sittiJ-;g fe1l to the floor." Sister Vary Wright l'/aS raised. in this home and has many memories of spiritual happenings tha.t took pla.ce here. Over the yea.rs the home changed hands and :.31ster Wright had a great desire to again live in the home. C. Hark Wright 'l-Tas In her later years her son, President trying to a.cquire a piece of property within the Stake which at that time was called 1111lcreek Stake and now designated as saJ.t lAke H111croclt S'b!to. :!e sot his Id'!O on tho hemo and property of h1~ mother's ch11dhood. c.nd 1n which nas a acqu1:r1.n..'5 it sha~blcs fca: wlId.~ this et tho tioo, ho prop~rty ,~as and thrcu'Sh the old hor.le in5Pirod as to ways a.,d ~ans t!1a Church and the hone for his l~ts. 'l'h1$ ",as fillClly ncco,!?lic.hod and. tho house restored and ref1niFlh31. She o.r.d her hu'3h:.·...'1d Cleeo t.e.vo lived. there now f'ar several years and are CO-'1tent 111th the ~ny opL.-1tual namorias cc•.n!:lcted with it. of Application # PL 92-4915 by W. Henry Pond to include property and home at 4288 S 500 E as a historic site in the Zoning Ordinance of Salt Lake County, Utah. S. L.COUNTY INFO. & PLAN SERVo 2001 S State St, N3600 Salt Lake City, UT 84190-4050 REQUEST FOR RECOMMENPATION ·Office Contact vI ~t1l016 == File Number - _____ PL-92-4015 Applicant: ________ POND, W HENRY D1'"1O Proposal: _________ REZONE FF:OM R-2-10 TO HISTORIC 4288 S 500 E _ _ For Property At: Zone P-2.-IO S i ze __________ Project name or description: ____________________________________________________ Agent: ____________________________________________________________________________ (Phone) (Mailing Address Include ZIP) In considering this application. the Planning Commission would appreciate recelvlng your recommendation for approval or disapproval. If you have insufficient data upon . which to make a recommendation. please inform the applicant of your needs. If APPROVAL is recommended. list any conditions that should be part of approval. If DISAPPROVAL is recommended, please state reasons for disapproval. This will be placed on the Planning Commission meeting of RECOMMENDATIONS: Department Name Date : ________ ~ ~~-VY1iTiCA~----3--=-~-::;:r-z:---=~~~~~~~~-~~~~~~~~-c7;];-7kid;;;.-:,::r;?f~ Fire ' Oepartment ....-Traffic Engineer City/Co .Hlth (JoAnn) Building Inspector Geologist O.S. Engineering S. L. Post Office . .--p.W. Adm. N3018 .. " '. ,. UDOT________~__~_______________________ Sheri ff' s Dept. ______-.-_______________ Within 1/2 mile of city____________________ S.L. City Water_______________________ D.S. Eng. Urb/Drai~.--_._--__~--~~~-Other d['#-1' t'/;5'h1-' ;< ...".1 ~c/e(;j II . .#G7~~ R~/t'y -')h7~ ~/pYJ -j---?e rON~&?7,.·o-lU V 7 If RECEIVED APR 0 7 1S92 DE~~tb~m~fJTcos/dNTY "'~, <.::RVICE April 6, 1992 w. Reynolds Salt Lake County Information & Planning Service 2001 South State street, N3600 Salt Lake City, utah 84190-4050 Dear Mr. Reynolds: On behalf of the Utah Heritage Foundation I have inspected the dwelling at 4288 South 500 East, a building requesting consideration to be designated as a historic site. The building in question is a vernacular designed house with modest victorian elements and dating from the late 19th/early 20th century. The painted masonry building maintains much of its original exterior integrity. I did not attempt to evaluate the interior of the building. It is my opinion from an exterior inspection that the house at 4288 South 500 East exhibits sufficient historic character and sense to be given a historic site determination. Should you have any questions on this position please do not hesitate to contact me. As always, thank you for asking the Utah Heritage Foundation to be involved in such historic preservation matters. e Executive Director 355 QUINCE STREET SALT LAKE CITY; UTAH 84103 (801) 533-0858 r . . -:;- /~ ':.1. J i. -;- ~ --i -;;- 4 : :; ~.-,,; ":. _ r .=-.c.. ::.. ~ ~ Department of Community & Economic Development Division of State History Utah State Historical Society Norman H. Bangerter Governor MaxJ.Evans Director 300 Rio Grande Salt Lake City. Utah 84101 -1182 (801) 533-5755 FAX: (801) 364-6436 March 16, 1992 W. Henry Pond 3950 South 700 East Suite 204 Salt Lake City, UT 84107 RE: 4288 South 500 East, Salt Lake County ·Dear Dr. Pond: We have reviewed the information on the William H. Hill(?) House at 4288 South 500 East. The house is a handsome Victorian Eclectic style building, apparently built in 1904. While the house is potentially eligible for the National Register of Historic Places, without a complete architectural context in Salt Lake County, listing would be a challenge. However, we definitely encourage its local recognition as a historic structure in Salt Lake County and its continued use and sensitive rehabilitation. From your description, the proposed re-use of this building as a dental office could help to ensure the building's long-term preservation. While different than the house's original use, the proposed re-use could be very compatible with the architecture of the house and comply with the Secretary of the Interior's Standard No.1 recommending a compatible use for rehabilitated historic structures. As you are aware, there is a 10% federal investment tax credit available for the substantial rehabilitation of historic (but not listed) structures used for non-residential functions. We hope that you will be able to utilize this preservation incentive. Best of luck in your planning for this project. If we can be of any assistance, particularly in providing technical preservation information, please feel free to contact us again. Sincerely, ~.~ Charles M. s;e~erd . Architectural Historian ~ Utah State Historic Preservation Office Board of State History: Douglas D. Alder· Marilyn C. Barker· Dale L. Berge • Boyd A. Blackner Hugh C. Garner • Peter L. GoS8 • David D. Hansen • Dean L. May • Amy Allen Price· Penny Sampinos • Jerry Wylie \ "" ....... \._~. -. ( j \;,.. . · l ...,.!-. .... ..._ '" ',_ _ .J- '-', l. L~ . !_ , i _.l.. Department of Community & Economic Development Division of State History Utah State Historical Society Norman IL Bangerter Governor MaxJ.Evans Director RECEIVED A.PR 0 ~ 1992 SALT LAKE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICE 300 Rio Grande Sah Lake City. Utah 84101·1182 (801) 533-5755 FAX: (801) 364-6436 April 8, 1992 Richard K. Thomas 473 East 4300 South Salt Lake City, UT 84107 RE: 4288 South 500 East, Salt Lake County Dear Mr. Thomas: This letter is in response to your visit yesterday and the questions and concerns you expressed in regards to the house at 4288 South 500 East and the comments in our letter to W. Henry Pond dated March 16, 1992. We hope that this letter will clarify our comments and the role of the Office of Preservation in this matter. Our letter to Dr. Pond was generated at his request for our oplnlon of the possible historic significance of the house in question. It was based on the historical information that he provided and a color photograph on the real estate fact sheet. We have since driven by the property. Even with the exterior alterations, the house remains potentially eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. It may also be eligible for the county's historic register. Recognition of the house as a historic site by Salt Lake County is at its discretion, based solely on its criteria. To clear-up one possible misconception, eligibility for, or listing on, the National Register does not constrain or over-ride any local government planning authority. The only exceptions to this would be if state or federal funding were involved in the project or if the local authority had enacted laws which gave special consideration to National Register properties. To our knowledge, neither of these situat~ons apply in this case. Also, the Division of State History (Utah State Historical Society) has no legal jurisdiction in this matter. We were asked to comment on the building's historic significance. Salt Lake County is entirely free to make planning decisions based on its comprehensive plan, ordinances, and planning process. Historic significance may be one of many variables considered in this process. Board of State Histor : louglas D. Alder· Marilyn C. Barker· Dale L. Berge • Boyd A. Blackner Hugh C. Gamer • Peter L. Goss • Da,;d L " Hansen • Dean L. May • Amy Allen Price· Penny Sampinos • Jerry Wylie As the Office of Preservation, we encourage the preservation and re-use of historic structures. Compatible re-use functions and sensitive rehabilitations are important to a building's continued preservation. Federal tax credits can be available in some situations for "substantial" rehabilitations to assist with this preservation effort. We provide technicai assistance to owners seeking these tax credits as well as recognition or understanding of a property's historic significance. Hopefully this information has clarified our involvement to date with this project. If we can be of any assistance, please feel free to contact us again. Sincerely, (]2z{tM.~ Charles M. Shepherd Architectural Historian Utah State Historic Preservation Office cc: W. Henry Pond, 3950 South 700 East Suite 204, Salt Lake City, UT 84107 Glen Graham, Salt Lake County Development Services Division, Plan Services Section, 2001 S. State St. N3600, SLC, UT 84190-4050 2 tiP ~4V( Millcreek Area Fff Communi Council April 8, 1992 Salt Lake County Planning Commission 2001 S State st #N3600 Salt Lake City, utah 84L90-4050 Dear Commissioner, PL92-4015 - W. Henry Pond - 4288 S 500 E - Include property and home under salt Lake County ordinance as a Historic Site. This council recommends denial of the above application for the reasons listed below. It is felt that Historical residential structures will not remain in harmony with the master plan unless they remain as a residential use. Because Mr. Pond is pursuing this change in zoning only because he wants to move his business into the home, we find that this proposal is not in harmony with the master plan. There were approximately 18 neighbor who attend our meeting. They submitted a petition containing about 49 signatures of neighbors which outlines their objection to any zoning change on the property. The neighbors were asked what their primary objection to the application was. The stated that they were a~ainst any zoning change which would allow a change in use from residential, even under a conditional use. Mr. Pond was asked if he would have perused having this structure designated as a historic site if he was not planning to move his business into it. He stated he would not because it would not be financially possible. There were several items pointed out which would detract from the historic significance of the structure: 1. The original structure has been modified over the years which altered it's appearance. a. The original screen porch on the rear was altered to a completely enclosed room. b. The deck over the porch was originally a roor over the porch, not a deck. c. The stairway on the south side g6ing to the upstairs deck was not part of the original structure. deck was not part of the original structure. d. On the south wall, the original window has been replaced with a garden window which is completely out of the historic time period. e. A previous doorway in the parlor to the outside was partially filled in with brick and a new window installed. 2. The inside of the structure was basically gutted and completely rebuild. a. The rooms have been rearranged and are different that the original home. . b. The kitchen was completely replaced. c. The upstairs has contained an activity room including a hot tub. d. The high ceilings have been lowered. 3. The large garage structure in the rear is not in harmony with the home. a. If the home is placed on the historic register, the garage should be torn down. b. There is a distinct possibility that the garage encroached on the property owned by the neighbor to the west. c. There is a strong possibility that a building permit was not obtained when the garage was built. 4. The structure appears to contain several coats of paint which is peeling off. a. To give the home part of it's initial appearance, it would be necessary to remove the paint and apply some type of transparent sealer. 5. Another consideration of the historic significance of the home is the family who lived in the home. a. For many years the home was known as the Wright home by many people yet the Wrights did not build the home, nor were they the original occupants. b. As far as the neighbors could determine, neither the Wrights or the family which build the home played a significant part in the historic history of the county. Another concern was with the additional traffic a business would initiate. Mr. Pond stated that a UDOT study indicated that his business would initiate 40 trips to or from his business. He stated that his traffic would not occur during peak times, early in the morning and late afternoon. In as much as the proposed business would be across the street from a school, the additional traffic would occur while the children are going to and from school in the morning, at noon and the afternoon. Many children cross the street at the intersection where the business would be . This would increase the danger to the children. On November 5, 1991 Mr. Pond appeared before this council with a proposal to change the zoning on the subject land from R-2-10 to a zone which would allow his dental practice. At that time the neighbors express a strong opposition to a change in zoning which allow a home use to change from residential to a business use. They were also concerned about the additional traffic, particularly because the home was across from the local school. As previously stated, the only reason Mr. Pond is pursuing this zoning change is so he has a chance of placing his dental practice into it. Requesting to have the home placed on the County historic register is only a means to and end for him, something he would not have perused otherwise. In talking with Clair Hardman about this application, he stated that he attend the same religious group in the same building as Mr. Pond. He stated he had spoken with him regarding this application. To avoid all possible appearances of a personal collaboration or conflict in this matter, we would suggest that Mr Hardman abstain from voting on this matter as a member of the County Historical Preservation group. It may even be advisable that he did not participate in the discussion on this matter. Per his request, I am sending a copy of this recommendation to him . .~~{h L!i Drage, Chai~ Millcreek Area Community Council cc: Clair Hardman 36453004 April 4, 1992 Development Services Division 2001 So. State Street Salt Lake City, trr 84190-4050 Ladies/Gentlemen: We are in receipt of your notice advising that W. Henry Pond. D.M.C., P.C., has made application for a rezoning request on property located on the Northeast Comer of Doreen Street (500 East 4288 South). There have been two previous rezoning requests on this same Propeny, and the neighborhood group successfully opposed and stopped these requests. We have reviewed County Zoning Chapter 1986. Historic Preservation. and all the additional uses this rezoning allows. We understand that Dr. Pond's primary reason for wanting to rezone and restore this property is to move his dental office into this building. Due to this being a residential neighborhood with public schools Witllin two city blocks. and many of the main entries to the school having no sidewalks for use by children or adults, we are most concerned about the added traffic that would be generated by a business at this location. We are very opposed to any zoning changes on this propeny, and are hereby requesting that the Planning Commission vote AGAINST approval of this application on April 28, 1992. Respectfully submined by a VERY, VERY concerned neighborhood in a primarily residential area, ADDRESS ("" .' r~ _ I. . L.( -- .. I .' ,. J .J.- ... J / - ,1'1 '. J J! c: PHONE PHONE ADDRESS Y7~~ S. 1!tJ~~ 26(-o:z..8~ ,I 1(; C/;'''. \ _ ......... . . .. - . . . ........ ..~ v""'\ / I M 7/ . ! L~/' 11" /':.~ 1/, (" ' • /f . '\ J\ ~ ,.) . / ': ? ;tPJz <:)tJ& . ~J.3a If .;.\ / 1 ,( /{~~ / " . X-4<~./ /' \ , i , "- ...... r ~ ', ;' 0' , }' . " ,.J ' ., ~17.. \ ,; " \ . -' " .: ; . \ J! .' 'I .' ,... /'~ : ('"t< ", . ., ' ' .r., ' . . ~,J' I " ~/ 3:.·i ).. ·5.f( f ;;bt:-1R~;/ c??6-U;sY ~ (y~ -(P5~ NAME PHONE ADDRESS '- n'8-ro'<i-ta x.(l-71JOZ " L~-S923 2c;G2/(J / 2.6 1)/ ~-7~~ -&" 3YP .72 ;}c 1-;;J.C73 rkZ~ ;/:, /'" :' /z(i!f:P&et,,:z; ~ ' -;!vh~~h-4;-Z~-A--f c~ " / '- 1& ,. )<:; ; - - 1. " ~ .~. ,. : ", " i ., ," //~~:.(!: ( I .. ' "" '; . 1. " ', 1, -· I +. " .., j. ~I i9-66-a3l?S' 0;-. 1---:;'0 /' _')-I'l frl ,\: , v{.<.¥ J3r. 7 -£'c50 0u: L- J.l J.M~ ,[/1 /-;;{b13 1(:2C7.E;tl0t2 Sa ,&56'.7",!}':?6" ,- ~~r AU'A-<--o.e~, ~, c' ,- \ \. , ), " ,." , .. ,/ / , c{t(P-f~~S j&~-47lJ7 PHONE ::<~;; -'17°'7 =tt?~ 173ZJ f ( .. I r- . i~g ? 'i!:;;,'~;:~?" . _) ., :. ,7 ,",' .---' .:.('t- . _ -/ . -' ~~:i':~:;;'w:3~ :.\ . , ':, ) r.~~ vlilliam H. Hill home. ;' , 1 t t • ~ .f :- '\ ..;~ ~ . .~~ . .... '(' ;, , ~ :.~, ~.. t- '- "~~... ~Io - • . " f ""'""'--"-' ,,----,,;,._......._...-::- --...,. William H. Hill and 1st wife Mary Caroline Sorensen . ... ~'--~"~ ·i~ · ~~~mm ~,_ <~; \'lil li am H. Hill , l Willi am H. Hills ' 2nd wife Elizabeth Hami lton . UilliaL.l ~: . Fill llOus e "19'/ 3 occupied b;;r G::-m1d Dm.l[shteJ': "1'~J.o-;.,J ", .,.--- "l·:;J. U~~"''''· ;.>;.>""- \+' -;........ .; br:"1··1··1..,. ~ r \ 1 Hillian E . lU lls' Grm1.d DiYtlfj -:.:cer i'~ •., J. - "'<~ ...~c.'r.>1'" \·' ,,-i g,·,t \1; ·c'11 J' I;:l . . l u..:.>__ h er h unba..Yld Clcoo lJriGht. "'~io. " 01 _ _ J,.... III . ... FAX TRANSMITTAL Office of Preservation - Utah Division of State History From Charles M. Shepherd Office of Preservation Division of State History 300 Rio Grande Salt Lake City, UT 84101 Phone (801)533-5755 FAX (801)364-6436 No. pages (including cover sheet) Message + State of Utah Department of Community & Economic Development Division of State History Utah State Historical Society Norman H . Bangerter Governor MaxJ.Evans Director 300 Rio Grande Salt Lake City, Utah 84101-1182 (801) 533-5755 FAX: (801) 364-6436 'P April/' 1992 Richard K. Thomas 473 East 4300 South Salt Lake City, UT 84107 RE: 4288 South 500 East, Salt Lake County Dear Mr. Thomas: This letter is in response to your visit yesterday and the questions and concerns you expressed in regards to the house at 4288 South 500 East and the comments in our letter to W. Henry Pond dated March 16, 1992. We hope that this letter will clarify our comments and the role of the Office of Preservation in this matter. Our letter to Dr. Pond was generated at his request for our opinion of the possible historic significance of the house in question. It was based on the historical information that he provided and a color photograph on the real estate fact sheet. We have since driven by the property. Even with the exterior alterations, the house remains potentially eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. It may also be eligible for the county's historic register. Recognition of the house as a historic site by Salt Lake County is at its discretion, based solely on its criteria. To clear-up one possible misconception, eligibility for, or listing on, the National Register does not constrain or over-ride any local government planning authority. The only exceptions to this would be if state or federal funding were involved in the project or if the local authority had enacted laws which gave special consideration to National Register properties. To our knowledge, neither of these situations apply in this case. Also, the Division of State History (Utah State Historical Society) has no legal jurisdiction in this matter. We were asked to comment on the building's historic significance. Salt Lake County is entirely free to make planning decisions based on its comprehensive plan, ordinances, and planning process. Historic significance may be one of many variables considered in this process. Board of State History: Douglas D. Alder • Marilyn C. Barker • Dale L. Berge • Boyd A. Blackner Hugh C. Garner • Peter L. Goss • David D. Hansen • Dean L. May • Amy Allen Price · Penny Sam pinos • Jerry Wylie As the Office of Preservation, we encourage the preservation and re-use of historic structures. Compatib1e re-use functions and sensitive rehabilitations are important to a building's continued preservation. Federal tax credits can be available in some situations for "substantial" rehabilitations to assist with this preservation effort. We provide technical assistance to owners seeking these tax credits as well as recognition or understanding of a property's historic significance. Hopefully this information has clarified our involvement to date with this project. If we can be of any assistance, please feel free to contact us again. Sincerely, Charles M. Shepherd Architectural Historian Utah State Historic Preservation Office cc: W. Henry Pond, 3950 South 700 East Suite 204, Salt Lake City, UT 84107 Glen Graham, Salt Lake County Development Services Division, Plan Services Section, 2001 S. State St. N3600, SLC, UT 84190-4050 2 - "', e·. I' .........,.. '" 1, j ;,. ;..:::l \.; - J" ... r·, 1- U 1. ''"T''"'' ....... U ""!. h LGLll. • t~ r:J. Department of Community & Economic Development Division of State History Utah State Historical Society Norman H. Bangerter Governor MaxJ. Evans Director 300 Rio Grande Salt lake City, Utah 84101-1182 (801) 533-5755 FAX: (801) 364-6436 April 8, 1992 Richard K. Thomas 473 East 4300 South Salt Lake City, UT 84107 RE: 4288 South 500 East, Salt Lake County Dear Mr. Thomas: This letter is in response to your visit yesterday and the questions and concerns you expressed in regards to the house at 4288 South 500 East and the comments in our letter to W. Henry Pond dated March 16, 1992. We hope that this letter will clarify our comments and the role of the Office of Preservation in this matter. Our letter to Dr. Pond was generated at his request for our opinion of the possible historic significance of the house in question. It was based on the historical information that he provided and a color photograph on the real estate fact sheet. We have since driven by the property. Even with the exterior alterations, the house remains potentially eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. It may also be eligible for the county's historic register. Recognition of the house as a historic site by Salt Lake County is at its discretion, based solely on its criteria. To clear-up one possible misconception, eligibility for, or listing on, the National Regis:er does not constrain or over-ride any local government planning authority. The only exceptions to this would be if state or federal funding were involved in the project or if the local authority had enacted laws which gave special consideration to National Register properties. To our knowledge, neither of these situations apply in this case. Also, the Division of State History (Utah State Historical Society) has no legal jurisdiction in this matter. We were asked to comment on the building's historic significance. Salt Lake County is entirely free to make planning decisions based on its comprehensive plan, ordinances, and planning process. Historic significance may be one of many variables considered in this process. Board of State History: Douglas D. Alder • Marilyn C. Barker • Dale L. b crge • Boyd A. Blackner Hugh C. Garner • Peter L. Goss • David D. Hansen • Dean L. May • Amy Allen Price ' Penny Sampinos • J erry Wylie As the Office of Preservation, we encourage the preservation and re-use of historic structures. Compatible re-use functions and sensitive rehabilitations are important to a building's continued preservation. Federal tax credits can be available in some situations for "substantial" rehabilitations to assist with this preservation effort. We provide technical assistance to owners seeking these tax credits as well as recognition or understanding of a property's historic significance. Hopefully this information has clarified our involvement to date with this project. If we can be of any assistance, please feel free to contact us again. Sincerely, OUJ-M·~ Charles M. Shepherd Architectural Historian Utah State Historic Preservation Office cc: W. Henry Pond, 3950 South 700 East Suite 204, Salt Lake City, UT 84107 Glen Graham, Salt Lake County Development Services Division, Plan Services Section, 2001 S. State St. N3600, SLC, UT 84190-4050 2 April 6, 1992 S. L. County Development Services Divn. Plan Services Section 2001 S. State St, #N3600 Salt Lake City, UT 84190-4050 Attn: Messrs. Glen Graham and John Young Re: PL 92-4015 -- Application by Henry Pond. D.M.D., P.C. Dear Board Members: The home located at 4288 South 500 East was, for all practical purposes, vacated by the late Mr. and Mrs. Wright It was eventually turned over to some Wright family members. These family members constructed an illegal building on the property and commenced with an illegal commercial venture. When the Salt Lake Planning and Zoning Board rejected this illegal operation, the Wrights then sold the property to the Johnsons. The Johnsons in tum proceeded with their own illegal commercial venture. This was also rejected by the Planning and Zoning Board. However, while in residence, the Johnsons made considerable changes to the interior and exterior of the home. As you know, Historic classification is concerned more with the exterior than the interior of a building. The old screened rear entrance, or porch, was converted to a solid wood room and was incorporated into the interior of the home, adjacent to the kitchen area. The roof over the front porch was drastically changed to an upper deck, leading to an interior hot tub/recreation-type room. From that upper deck a modem stairway was constructed on the outside of the home leading down to ground level and into another exterior hot tub area, consisting of a redwood deck and a 6-foot wood fence extending from the home to the property line on Doreen Street, then west to the rear of the house, then north to the rear entrance of the house. A large window on the south side of the house was altered drastically into an allglass protruding type suitable for a modem-day flower window, or miniature hot house type window. The old original brick of the home has been painted several times. It was once painted white, and is now painted a blue/grey. The removal of that paint to restore the original old brick texture would drastically deteriorate and deface the old brick. To this date, not one individual in the Wright family has ever applied for or had an interest in an Historic classification for the home in question; nor has any other individual, group, or historic preservation organization ever applied for such a classification. In the Fall of 1991, Dr. Henry Pond attempted to have this property rezoned from R-2-10 to a modified commercial RM zone in order to set up a dental practice in the home. A meeting of the Millcreek Community Council was held on November 5, 1991 to discuss the proposal. Many people in the neighborllood attended this meeting and strenuously objected to having the property rezoned for a commercial venture. Dr. Pond's request for rezoning was subsequently rejected. Now, Dr. Pond, with apparently only his own personal agenda in mind, is attempting to have the property rezoned as an Historic site. We believe that his only intent and reason for requesting the rezoning to an Historic site is so he can use the home for a dental clinic facility. Dr. Pond has displayed a total disregard for the residents in this area. Page Two S. L. County Development Services Divn. April 6, 1992 We, as individuals, and as a group of concerned citizens in this neighborhood, will present to you as Board Members our legitimate reasons why this petition for rezoning should not be approved. We are looking forward to the meeting scheduled for April 14, 1992. Respectfully submitted on behalf of a majority of our neighborhood, by Richard K. Thomas 473 East 4300 South Salt Lake City, UT 84107 Phone 266-8637 P.S. I served on the Civic Belt Route Committee in the late 50's. My assignment was the task of taking an aerial survey. I have also worked with the Utah Heritage Foundation as a tour guide regarding historic facilities. April 4, 1992 Development Services Division 2001 So. State Street Salt Lake City, UT 84190-4050 Ladies/Gentlemen: We are in receipt of your notice advising that W. Henry Pond, D.M.C., P.C., has made application for a rezoning request on property located on the Northeast Comer of Doreen Street (500 East 4288 South). There have been two previous rezoning requests on this same property,and the neighborhood group successfully opposed and stopped these requests. We have reviewed County Zoning Chapter 1986, Historic Preservation, and all the additional uses this rezoning allows. We understand that Dr. Pond's primary reason for wanting to rezone and restore this property is to move his dental office into this building. Due to this being a residential neighborhood with public schools within two city blocks, and many of the main entries to the school having no sidewalks for use by children or adults, we are most concerned about the added traffic that would be generated by a business at this location. We are very opposed to any zoning changes on this property, and are hereby requesting that the Planning Commission vote AGAINST approval of this application on April 28, 1992. Respectfully submitted by a VERY, VERY concemed neighborhood in a primarily residential area, ADDRESS PHONE PHONE ADDRESS ;)0 ~ ~ 9&~J'""" ~i:2 - ( ~25- Z ·; 6:-67/37~)b&,~a3a 't3 -a . Q(,VV' >/ j / v ..MN L- Z t?·- .3 y~~ 7/ ,'fyz~~ Ji ;1;;·.2.) 1 5iYV t7~ 9· ~Y-/..1..C(j I, ' l){ "U '--./ cr; . I~' \ ~ -. / I it /i ...... ,~ U dbb-:lK~;/ c2 t:- 6 --YJ?:;sy ~ ~~ -(P5;)j 1~/ '-h5'2-p PHONE ADDRESS NAME c:XO 3·- (0 I 1- fo ~(l'- 71;; 01-. c... - -0C- 07 2-7 -.5 . -) Lf?J/~ Lf380 t '3 /£ 3 ~-/:7~ ? /-)0 G 2-/c / cSJ? .2 5 Z6 -72 iJj ~'7~~. -.~ 3 y'f/ // ;).G, 1-;;2C 73 ~, /-~i13 I /~) .' . ( ,/, Department of Community & Economic Development Division of State History Utah State Historical Society Norman H. Bangerter Governor MaxJ. Evans Director 300 Rio Grande Salt Lake City. Utah 84101-1182 (801) 533-5755 FAX: (801) 364-6436 March 16, 1992 W. Henry Pond 3950 South 700 East Suite 204 Salt Lake City, UT 84107 RE: 4288 South 500 East, Salt Lake County Dear Dr. Pond: We have reviewed the information on the William H. Hill(?) House at 4288 South 500 East. The house is a handsome Victorian Eclectic style building, apparently built in 1904. While the house is potentially eligible for the National Register of Historic Places, without a complete architectural context in Salt Lake County, listing would be a challenge. However, we definitely encourage its local recognition as a historic structure in Salt Lake County and its continued use and sensitive rehabilitation. From your description, the proposed re-use of this building as a dental office could help to ensure the building's long-term preservation. While different than the house's original use, the proposed re-use could be very compatible with the architecture of the house and comply with the Secretary of the Interior's Standard No.1 recommending a compatible use for rehabilitated historic structures. As you are aware, there is a 10% federal investment tax credit available for the substantial rehabilitation of historic (but not listed) structures used for non-residential functions. We hope that you ,will be able to utilize this preservation incentive. Best of luck in your planning for this project. If we can be of any assistance, particularly in providing technical preservation information, please feel free to contact us again. Sincerely, ~.~ Charles M. s~e~erd Architectural Historian Utah State Historic Preservation Office Board of State History: Douglas D. Alder • Marilyn C. Barker • Dale L. Berge • Boyd A Blaclmer Hugh C. Garner • Peter L. Goss • David D. Hansen • Dean L. May • Amy Allen Price· Penny Sampinos • Jerry Wylie Department of Community & Economic Development Division of State History Utah State Historical Society Norman H. Bangerter Governor MaxJ.Evans Director 300 Rio Grande Salt Lake City. Utah 84101 ·1182 (801) 533·5755 FAX : (801 ) 364·6436 March 16, 1992 W. Henry Pond 3950 South 700 East Suite 204 Salt Lake City, UT 84107 RE: 4288 South 500 East, Salt Lake County Dear Dr. Pond: We have reviewed the information on the William H. Hill(?) House at 4288 South 500 East. The house is a handsome Victorian Eclectic style building, apparently built in 1904. While the house is potentially eligible for the National Register of Historic Places, without a complete architectural context in Salt Lake County, listing would be a challenge. However, we definitely encourage its local recognition as a historic structure in Salt Lake County and its continued use and sensitive rehabilitation. From your description, the proposed re-use of this building as a dental office could help to ensure the building's long-term preservation. While different than the house's original use, the proposed re-use could be very compatible with the architecture of the house and comply with the Secretary of the Interior's Standard No.1 recommending a compatible use for rehabilitated historic structures. As you are aware, there is a 10% federal investment tax credit available for the substantial rehabilitation of historic (but not liste d) structures used for non-residential functions . We hope that you will be able to utilize this preservation incentive. Best of luck in your planning for this project. If we can be of any assistance, particularly in providing technical preservation information, please feel free to contact us again. Sincerely, ~.~ Charles M. s~e~erd Architectural Historian Utah State Historic Preservation Office Board of State History: Douglas D. Alder • Marilyn C. Barker • Dale 1. Berge • Boyd A. Blackner Hugh C. Garner • Peter 1. Goss • David D. Hansen • Dean L. May • Amy Allen Price ' Penny Sam pinos • J erry Wylie 4288 South 500 East 4288 South 500 East Salt Lake City, Utah BUILDING RENTABLE SQ. FT.: 2,717 square feet TOTAL NUMBER OF FLOORS: 2 A V AILABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE: Main - 1,467 sq. ft.; 2nd - 1,250 sq. ft. ACREAGE: .33 ZONING: R-2 ASKING PURCHASE PRICE: $109,000 COMMENTS: Charming building with lots of character throughout. Will need to be rezoned to facilitate offices . ~ . :-" - VG4/GG \ .~ l •• ; " , ... rn1\,<:::n! 'nATFD O!'..AI:r" GROUP • .,,, =~"t . 1f)0 Sou th . Suit8 710 Salt Lake City . UT 84111 • o>'one (801 ) 322-2000 0.37 TOT(.:IL ACRES UPDATE 15650 REAL ESTATE 103320 LEGAL BUILDINGS TAX CLASS NE o MOTOF: VEHIC EDIT 1 B(.:ITCH NO 0 1 18970 TOTAL VALUE 68101 BATCH SEQ 0 ED I T 1 BOOK 6378 PAGE 0770 DATE 11/22/91 TYPE UNI<N PLAT PRO PER T Y DES C RIP T ION BEG N 0-03'15' W 1358.12 FT FR SE COR LOT i. BLK 7. TEN AC PLAT A, BIG FIELD SUR; N 0-03'15" W 97 FT; N 88-35' W 159.19 FT; S 100 FT M OR L TO N LINE OF DOREEN STREET; E'LY ALG SD STREET 160 FT M OR L TO BEG 0.37 AC M OR L 4597-1029 PRINT ~ ,-- ... ,- P 5395-0589 5413-0002 5604-1973 5629-2912 ~ h/. Wr'qht- ~rL-(i~~ ~.}vn(Fk,r: cnn-;haM. p.,. _1:?l-'h'l~ ., ~e~ lCoc;.c.. ItJ (l1bvr Lllf8?t-cel:=-- ~~ tl-to Mo.rlL. wnqk.-f- { Ar 1t ne.M~ M.. ""e~"\ ~'t> W~~ U.\I~CX~Cb. M~ ~. ~LW'"..k~ ['t-\lU--) C (£, - 2.4 rl C 15s- - (3/ (J..f::; 2(..,,"f 0-- 'j I ~ c:" \,;-.JM.. l-\,. ~ H.lLt.-- l..t\L,{...- (~lV?~) l{(o((~ . ~~ ~u.... \\ 'Z.~.6:-- ;.g ;>< ~i -4~ l15 - t40 ~ -g l4 .- t--~$ r 2-01'" "IS S - 2-01-- z-- ~I~ -z.--z.,ck,7ht.-b 1""2- C~- 'Ol~ L· fE::~-"!,;)~ ~V~- "\.\.Cfq"''' ,nt!\\ 4288 South 500 East 0, H./. "l COLDWeLL BANl(eRO JREMIER, INC. General Features Up Main ~athrooms 1 Full ;:;'ireplaces 1 ;;'ormal Dining Ye. s )tyl~ 2 2 Bedrooms Kitchen Dining Yes story Total 2717 1250 1467 '\pproximate Square Footage Down 2 Full 1 Full 1 Bar ~ Family Room _l-la_i_n_ _ _ _ LaundryM_a_l._·n_ __ Construction Brick ApproximateAge 999 Patio~Deck Yes Special Features and Financing THIS IS A WONDERFULL TWO STORY HOME, SET BACK ON A WELL LANDSCAPED LOT. * * * LOTS OF EXTRA'S Lots 0f natural woodwork and tile High ceilings Attic has been built-out nicely The upstairs bath features a jetted bath shower The home has many improvements including a nicely done kitchen * * * 70 X 23 heated mechanics dream garage 7: Home has its own working well Hardwood floors, woodburning stove, water softener ~(~ "1~1> ~?f'RoX... '2-£\ I X TERMS: ' Conventional, Cash '2-4' -:i?A.CE TAXES: Jementary_H_i_l_l_V_I_e_w_ _ _ _ JuniorHigh Granite Park ';ales Associate Doug Winward ~0')2... ·~.HU>O.Y\ $1,321.00 OFFERS Senior High _ _ G_ra_n_l._ · t_e_ _ _ __ Coldwell Banker Premier Office __S_u_g_a_r_H_o_u_s_e_ __ ~esidence Telephone:--4_6_7_-_4_3-:-0-::-4-:---::-::--:-::-_ _ _ _ _ Office Telephone _ _4_8_6_-_3_1_7_5_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Digital pager 481-3269 4288 South 500 East 4288 South 500 East Salt Lake City, Utah BUILDING RENTABLE SQ. Fr.: 2,717 square feet TOTAL NUMBER OF FLOORS: 2 AVAILABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE: Main - 1,467 sq. ft.; 2nd - 1,250 sq. ft. ACREAGE: .33 ZONING: R-2 ASKING PURCHASE PRICE: $109,000 i Charming building with lots of character throughout. Will need to be rezoned to facilitate offices. COMMENTS: - • - r""-'Cf"'Ii InATFf) RF ArTY /t\ . 10,'.£ GROUP 175 East 400 South. Suite 710 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 • Phone (801) 322-2000 |
| Reference URL | https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s60s5d8w |



