MRI Signal Intensity Varies Along the Course of the Normal Optic Nerve

Title MRI Signal Intensity Varies Along the Course of the Normal Optic Nerve
Creator Michael L. Prairie, Mehmet Gencturk; Bruce R. Lindgren; Collin M. McClelland; Michael S. Lee
Affiliation Departments of Ophthalmology and Visual Neurosciences (MLP, CMM, MSL), Neuroradiology (MG) and Biostatistics (BRL), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Abstract Background: MRI can help distinguish various causes of optic neuropathy including optic neuritis. Importantly, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) has a propensity to cause enhancement of the prechiasmatic optic nerves. To determine whether the prechiasmatic optic nerve (PC-ON) demonstrates a different intensity from the midorbital optic nerve (MO-ON) on MRI among patients without optic neuropathy. Methods: Data were retrospectively obtained from 75 patients who underwent brain MRI for an ocular motor nerve palsy between January 2005 and April 2021. Inclusion criteria were patients aged 18 years or older with visual acuities of at least 20/25 and no evidence of optic neuropathy on neuro-ophthalmic examination. A total of 67 right eyes and 68 left eyes were assessed. A neuroradiologist performed quantitative intensity measurements of the MO-ON and PC-ON on precontrast and postcontrast T1 axial images. Normal-appearing temporalis muscle intensity was also measured and used as a reference to calculate an intensity ratio to calibrate across images. Results: The mean PC-ON intensity ratio was significantly higher than the MO-ON intensity ratio on both precontrast (19.6%, P < 0.01) and postcontrast images (14.2%, P < 0.01). Age, gender, and laterality did not independently affect measurements. Conclusions: The prechiasmatic optic nerve shows brighter intensity ratios on both precontrast and postcontrast T1 images than the midorbital optic nerve among normal optic nerves. Clinicians should recognize this subtle signal discrepancy when assessing patients with presumed optic neuropathy.
Subject Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Neuromyelitis Optica / diagnosis; Optic Nerve / diagnostic imaging; Optic Nerve Diseases / diagnosis; Optic Nerve Diseases / etiology; Optic Neuritis / complications; Optic Neuritis / diagnosis; Retrospective Studies
Date 2023-12
Date Digital 2023-12
References 1. Becker M, Masterson K, Delavelle J, Viallon M, Vargas MI, Becker CD. Imaging of the optic nerve. European Journal of Radiology. 2010;74(2):299-313. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.09.029. 2. Selhorst JB, Chen Y. The optic nerve. Semin Neurol. 2009;29(1):29-35. doi:10.1055/s-0028-1124020. 3. Toosy AT, Mason DF, Miller DH. Optic neuritis. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(1):83-99. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70259-X. 4. Bennett JL. Optic Neuritis. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2019;25(5):1236-1264. doi:10.1212/CON.0000000000000768. 5. Thompson AJ, Banwell BL, Barkhof F, et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17(2):162-173. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30470-2.
Language eng
Format application/pdf
Type Text
Publication Type Journal Article
Source Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology, December 2023, Volume 43, Issue 4
Collection Neuro-Ophthalmology Virtual Education Library: Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology Archives: https://novel.utah.edu/jno/
Publisher Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
Rights Management © North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society
ARK ark:/87278/s6jmh3c5
Setname ehsl_novel_jno
ID 2635265
Reference URL https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6jmh3c5