Respiratory tract illness surveillance in patients at a community clinic during the 2010 influenza season

Update Item Information
Title Respiratory tract illness surveillance in patients at a community clinic during the 2010 influenza season
Publication Type thesis
School or College School of Medicine
Department Pathology
Author Atkinson, Annette
Date 2012-12
Description Viruses cause the majority of respiratory infections. A rapid laboratory method to accurately diagnose etiology of respiratory illness can inform physicians and guide treatment decisions. The objective of this cross-sectional, laboratory based surveillance study is to assess the sensitivity and specificity of influenza virus rapid antigen assay Quidel A+B (Quidel, San Diego, CA) and two multiplex respiratory pathogen assays [Idaho Technology FilmArray® Respiratory Panel (Idaho Technology, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT) and Qiagen ResPlex™ II (Qiagen, Germantown, MD)] compared with influenza virus polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays. Patients seeking treatment for influenza-like-illness (ILI) in the outpatient setting were identified between October 17, 2010 and May 31, 2011. A total of 1,481 ILI patients were seen. Nasal specimens were collected and tested on all assays for 253 of these patients. Sensitivity and specificity of each influenza and multiplex respiratory assay was calculated relative to a gold standard PCR assay. The self-reported symptom profiles of each organism identified in the respiratory pathogen panels were compared. The median patient age was 12 years (range: 0-89 years); 176 (70%) had one or more viruses detected in the nasal swab specimen. Sensitivity for influenza A was 92% (95% CI: 88-99%) for FilmArray® RP, 85% (95% CI: 81- 96%) for ResPlex™ II, and 38% (95% CI: 48-71%) for Rapid, with specificities of 99.5-100%. Sensitivity for influenza B was 85% (95% CI: 86-99%), 70% (95% CI: 66-90%) for ResPlex™ II, and 6% (95% CI: 0-23%) for Rapid, with specificities of 99.5-100%. A similar pattern was seen for noninfluenza viruses, with the FilmArray® RP assay being more sensitive and specific than the ResPlex™ II. The use of multiplex viral assays is becoming more common in point-of-care settings. In this study, the Idaho Technology FilmArray® Respiratory Panel was more sensitive and specific than the Qiagen ResPlex™ II assay for influenza A and B viruses, as well as other common respiratory viruses.
Type Text
Publisher University of Utah
Subject MESH Disease Outbreaks; Epidemiological Monitoring; Influenza, Human; Polymerase Chain Reaction; Immunologic Tests; Influenza-like Illness; Community-acquired Illness
Dissertation Institution University of Utah
Dissertation Name Master of Science
Language eng
Relation is Version of Digital reproduction of Respiratory Tract Illness Surveiilance in Patients at a Community Clinic During the 2010 Influenza Season. Spencer S. Eccles Health Sciences Library. Print version available at J. Willard Marriott Library Special Collections.
Rights Management Copyright © Annette Atkinson 2012
Format application/pdf
Format Medium application/pdf
Format Extent 191,087 bytes
Source Original in Marriott Library Special Collections, RA4.5 2012.A84
ARK ark:/87278/s6157r7f
Setname ir_etd
ID 196282
Reference URL https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6157r7f
Back to Search Results