Rationing of health care in Britain: an ethical critique of public policy-making

Update Item Information
Publication Type Journal Article
School or College College of Social & Behavioral Science
Department Political Science
Creator Francis, John G.; Francis, Leslie P.
Title Rationing of health care in Britain: an ethical critique of public policy-making
Date 1986
Description IN BRITAIN, as in the United States, rationing of health care is a fact of life and death. Some rationing is overt, such as the Stanford heart transplant program's decision not to accept very young or older patients.1 Some is disguised, such as day-to-day decisions in hospitals about "do not resuscitate" orders2 or the reported British reluctance to offer dialysis to older patients who might be a bit "crumbly."3
Type Text
Publisher Rowman & Littlefield Publishers
First Page 119
Last Page 134
Subject Rationing; National Health Service
Subject LCSH Health care rationing -- Great Britain; Medical care -- Great Britain -- Moral and ethical aspects; Medical policy -- Great Britain -- Moral and ethical aspects; Medical economics -- Great Britain; Medical care -- Decision making
Language eng
Bibliographic Citation Francis, J. G., Francis, L. P. (1986). Rationing of health care in Britain: an ethical critique of public policy-making, in Should medical care be rationed by age? Rowman and Littlefield, 119-34.
Rights Management (c)Rowman & Littlefield Publishers This material is still protected by copyright. All rights reserved. Please contact the publisher for permission to copy, distribute or reprint.
Format Medium application/pdf
Format Extent 9,067,988 bytes
Identifier ir-main,4258
ARK ark:/87278/s6x06r6z
Setname ir_uspace
ID 703424
Reference URL https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6x06r6z
Back to Search Results