Relationship of intraoperative electrophysiological criteria to outcome after selective functional posterior rhizotomy

At British Columbia's Children's Hospital, the criteria used in selective functional posterior rhizotomy (SFPR) evolved in three distinct phases. In Phase 1 the electrophysiological criteria for abnormality included a low threshold to a single stimulation, a sustained response to 50-Hz stimulation, and spread outside the segmental level being stimulated. In Phase 2 the electrophysiological criteria were unchanged, but fewer L3-4 nerve roots were cut. In Phase 3, fewer L3-4 nerve roots were cut, as in Phase 2, but based on the results of posterior nerve root stimulation in nonspastic controls, the only electrophysiological criterion used was contralateral and suprasegmental spread. The present study examined the relationship between the criteria used in each phase and patient outcome. The records of 77 consecutive children who underwent SFPR and had a minium follow-up period of 1 year were reviewed, comprising 25, 19, and 33 patients in Phases 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Outcome parameters included quantitative assessments of lower-limb spasticity and range of motion, and qualitative assessments of lower-limb function. In Phase 3, 52% of the nerve roots were cut, compared to 66% in Phases 1 and 2. In all three phases there was a significant decrease in lower-limb spasticity and an increase in range of movement, with the smallest decrease in spasticity in Phase 3. Over 90% of children in each phase improved with respect to lower-limb function, and excluding independent walkers and quadriplegics confined to a wheelchair, improvement in the level of ambulation occurred in 87.5%, 71.4%, and 73.7% of patients, in Phases 1, 2, and 3, respectively.