| OCR Text |
Show # 1044 Page 4 that particular type of thing. And what it is, is just calling on various expertise around the programs, and there's no sense in four programs litigating financial responsibility on reservation, and all of them going off in their own direction? Y: Well, you, the there are a series of failures that you're describing. Ahm - one is the failure of ah, some of us and I certainly must plead guilty to ah, when we have a suit to try to spread it around. As wherein we publish a newsletter which describes it for layman, but we don't always get our pleadings out, and things like that. I admit that, and the same is true for other programs. Ah - you know, all of us feel our primary problem is this representing our clients, and we get bogged down in that ah - in the sense of - of not sharing what's going on. I agree, there's a - but, but it's mostly communications, and there have been several proposals talked about here. Which one do you think, you know, I mean this morning, you know, we talked about the clearinghouse that exists, has been talked about, and ah, the idea of a, and an especially Indian clearinghouse. We talked about, Hal Gross's talk about a legislative newsletter. What, what, do you think those things are going to be the answer to anything? Or *~- B: I think the ideal thing is, you mentioned this back- up center type thing, but until the original so, we don't |
