Planning, programming, budgeting system and alternative futures contingency budgets: a comparative theoretical analysis

I am delighted to express my appreciation for the assistance in the completion of this study provided by many individuals. A very large debt of gratitude is owed to Professor Frank C. Hachman and Mr. Craig Bigler, Associate Utah State Planning Coordinator, in that they are responsible for the original ideas and proposals which developed into the Utah Process and were also intimately involved in the successful carrying out of that project. Other co-workers on the Utah Process project in the State Planning Coordinator's Office to whom special recognition is due include Douglas C. W. Kirk, Bruce L. Heath, and Rhead S. Bowman. In a very real sense, much thanks is due to the entire Utah State Government, but special mention must be made of Governor Calvin L. Rampton and the three State Planning Coordinators under whom the Utah Process was originated and carried out: Kenneth C. Olson, William G. Bruhn, and Burton L. Carlson.