Fitness for Duty program evaluation

Impairment of employees is on the rise. Many corporations have implemented Fitness For Duty (FFD) programs to help control the costs associated with impairment. Costs can result from accidents on the job, increased health claims, workers compensation claims, absenteeism, and low productivity. Research has not validated these programs. The purpose of this study was to analyze the costs and benefits of rehabilitation versus replacement of employees in Organization A's FFD program. The study provided a financial perspective to use when considering the dollars invested in FFD programs. This perspective should not be considered in isolation. Nonmonetary benefits still need to be considered. A retrospective review of records was conducted for Organization A. The results from the study showed that the FFD program was not cost effective. Further research is needed to identify the value of nonmonetary benefits of the program. Emphasis on prehire screening and appropriate referrals is recommended.