Assessing Research Compliance for Federally Funded Projects: The Good, the Bad, and the Publicly Accessible

Update item information
Publication Type article
Department J. Willard Marriott Library
Creator Rebekah Cummings; Lindsay Ozburn; Andrea Payant; Betty Rozum; Michael Shelton; Ryan Bushman
Title Assessing Research Compliance for Federally Funded Projects: The Good, the Bad, and the Publicly Accessible
Date 2020-08-12
Description In 2016, Utah State University launched a program to ensure their campus' federal grant recipients were in compliance with funder mandates to share any data or publications produced as a result of the award. This paper discusses how a cross-institutional team of librarians and administrators evaluated the success of this program using online asynchronous focus groups (OAFG) in conjunction with a traditional survey. The challenges and successes of using OAFGs to assess library services are also examined. An OAFG gave participants greater convenience, flexibility, participation, and time to craft answers, eliminating some of the hurdles to traditional focus group participation.
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Journal Title Journal of Library Administration
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2020.1786985
Subject research data management; assessment; online asynchronous focus groups (OAFG); grant compliance
Language eng
Bibliographic Citation Rebekah Cummings, Lindsay Ozburn, Andrea Payant, Betty Rozum, Michael Shelton & Ryan Bushman (2020) Assessing Research Compliance for Federally Funded Projects: The Good, the Bad, and the Publicly Accessible, Journal of Library Administration, DOI: 10.1080/01930826.2020.1786985
Rights Management (c) Rebekah Cummings, Lindsay Ozburn, Andrea Payant, Betty Rozum, Michael Shelton & Ryan Bushman
Format Medium PDF
ARK ark:/87278/s6131gqf
Setname ir_uspace
Date Created 2020-08-13
Date Modified 2021-05-06
ID 1589347
Reference URL https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6131gqf
Back to Search Results