| Description |
This thesis explores the relationship between audiences and performers in theatre. Contemporary companies which consciously tamper with this relationship are analyzed. Particular focus is on companies that explore the extent to which the audience can directly affect a performance. The reasoning of companies for developing these theatre experiences is explored as well as audience reactions. Why is such theatre happening in the world today? The core question of this thesis is: how is audience agency implemented in today's theatre? Audiences have little agency, say, or influence when viewing theatre. This is true in proscenium-style theaters and in smaller, more intimate theaters. This thesis explores the relationship between audiences and performers, particularly focusing on giving the audience greater agency than they are usually afforded, allowing them to make decisions and directly influence the performance. What would happen if the audience felt directly involved with the development or unfolding of the events or story as well? This could potentially lead to a sense of communal pride and familiarity. Through what elements could this sense be found? This thesis begins with ways in which audience agency is implemented in proscenium-style theatre. The benefits and drawbacks of audience passivity are analyzed. Various theatre companies and practitioners who have experimented-or are experimenting-with audience/performer relationships are explored through case-studies, especially relating to audience agency. |
