OCR Text |
Show -52- Gauge height. Discharge. Date. Hydrographer. (feet) (sec. ft.) Remarks « 24 do 18.45 5,500 « 26 do 18.40 4,979 •« 28 do 18.50 5,544 Dec. 1 do 20.00 2,762 Considerable (4 3 " do 19.25 7,862 drift 5 do 18.85 6,347 (4 8 tt do 18.30 4,825 " 10 it do 18.20 5,081 M 12 ti do 18.00 4,669 14 15 It do 17.65 3,818 M 16 It do 17.50 3,589 II 18 it do 18.30 5,361 14 19 t do 18.05 4,607 (< 20 t do 18.05 5,237 ft 22 I do 17.70 4,698 If 24 it do 18.00 4,863 a 26 u do 18.10 5,306 tt 27 u do 18.30 5,497 it 29 do 18.00 4,588 it 31 do 17.70 4,176 Jan. 2, 1903 R. M. Swain 17.40 3,423 3 do 17.30 3,503 a 5 " W. D. Smith 17.00 3,133 a 7 ft do 16.90 2,826 a 9 do 16.90 2,722 a 10 do 16.9 2,818 a 12 a do 16.8 2,694 tt 14 a do 16.95 2,903 (4 19 a do 17.00 2,939 14 21 " do 17.00 2,900 Jun. 23 i. do 17.10 3,078 (4 24 tt do 17.20 3,170 25 it do 17.20 2,997 26 <( do 17.40 3,320 tt 27 (1 do 17.40 3,266 tt 29 f do 17.50 3,297 a 31 I do 17.40 3,382 Feb. 2 ' do 17.20 2,978 " 3 i do 17.15 2,847 6 a do 17.20 3,179 it 7 ti do 17.20 3,171 |
Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : California exhibits. |