OCR Text |
Show -3- 8,722,000 Apportioned to lower basin (art. Ill (a) and (b) Colorado River compact)...................... 8,500,000 Not apportioned to lower basin but present in lower basin.............................................. 222,000 Potential uses of water in other States of the lower basin apportioned to lower basin........ 8,500,000 [p. 17] Potential uses in California limited by California Limitation Act .......................... 4,400,000 Nevada contract.............................. 300,000 Ultimate possible uses Utah and New Mexico................................ 131,000 4,831,000 Usable only in Arizona.............................. 3,669,000 Present uses in Arizona from main stream and tributaries, including Gila.................... 1,407,000 Left for Arizona, additional mainstream water (consumptive uses)........ 2,262,000 Consumptive use, Yuma-Mesa and Wellton-Mohawk divisions of Gila project ............................ 600,000 Consumptive use, Bridge-Canyon and central Arizona project........ 1,100,000 1,700,000 Left in main stream apportioned to Arizona for future development and consumptive use in Arizona........................ 562,000 |
Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : California exhibits. |